Conspiracy is when people agree to violate the law. Not sure everyone does that.
They may have a good chance for acquittal as the charge seems to relate to paying hush money to squash negative stories.
Maybe the jury will decide that's OK.
The falsifying business records seems straightforward.
Tell Lou that statutes can be tolled.
Results 21,301 to 21,310 of 26458
Thread: Politics Thread
-
05-07-2024, 07:39 AM #21301...he went up late, and I was already up there.
-
05-07-2024, 08:03 AM #21302
I’ll be shocked if the jury finds him not guilty. This will be another case of jury nullification. Will they want to be known as the people in NYC who didn’t convict Trump? They won’t follow the law. This case should have never been brought, just like the civil trial about real estate values.
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkGolf is a relatively simple game, played by reasonably intelligent people, stupidly.
-
05-07-2024, 08:28 AM #21303
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Posts
- 2,597
-
05-07-2024, 08:42 AM #21304
Our government kinda sucks.
And, I think I know why! It's because WE kinda suck!"You can't fix stupid." Ron White
-
05-07-2024, 11:27 AM #21305
-
05-07-2024, 11:59 AM #21306
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Posts
- 3,460
Anyone following the p star's testimony? She went on the stand and said the deed was done despite Trump saying otherwise (not under oath though).
I am a big proponent of getting your day in court. I would love to see Trump take the stand and answer whether it happened or not. It won't happen, but still I would love to see that. I know there are instances where the court/juries just gets it wrong, but for the most part they get it right.
-
05-07-2024, 02:26 PM #21307
-
05-07-2024, 03:49 PM #21308“The primary crime that we have alleged is New York state election law section 17-152,” Manhattan Assistant District Attorney Joshua Steinglass told New York Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan during Trump’s trial on April 23
https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article...eople-v.-trump...he went up late, and I was already up there.
-
05-07-2024, 05:18 PM #21309
-
05-07-2024, 06:34 PM #21310
Sounds like the porn star’s testimony and the judge’s allowing it gave Trump’s team a great basis for appeal. Testimony about the alleged affair is certainly reasonable. It seems the prosecution took it even further, allowing her to get into graphic details of the alleged encounter.
I think the only reason for that testimony was to embarrass Trump and prejudice the jury even more towards him. Then again, the prosecution couldn’t care less about losing anything on appeal. By then, the election will be over.
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkGolf is a relatively simple game, played by reasonably intelligent people, stupidly.
Bookmarks