Page 1913 of 2646 FirstFirst ... 9131413181318631903191119121913191419151923196320132413 ... LastLast
Results 19,121 to 19,130 of 26457

Thread: Politics Thread

  1. #19121
    Quote Originally Posted by xuwillie View Post
    True but “there are consequences to your actions” is pretty accurate here and goes well outside just politics.
    But what is the political advantage? I get that turnaround is fair play, but if there isn't a political advantage, then why cut off your nose to spite your face.

    McCarthy doesn't have the votes to get this passed, and I am doubtful he is going to turnup something new that will convince the hold-outs in his own party, most of who are sitting in districts Biden won, to vote for impeach and risk their own reelection.

    Further, the past impeachments have shown that there is a backlash against the party doing the impeaching. So all this seems to do is make happy a few members in safe seats at the cost of the vulnerable members of their narrow majority.
    "If our season was based on A-10 awards, there’d be a lot of empty space up in the rafters of the Cintas Center." - Chris Mack

  2. #19122
    Supporting Member Strange Brew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Denver, Co
    Posts
    6,882
    Quote Originally Posted by STL_XUfan View Post
    But what is the political advantage? I get that turnaround is fair play, but if there isn't a political advantage, then why cut off your nose to spite your face.

    McCarthy doesn't have the votes to get this passed, and I am doubtful he is going to turnup something new that will convince the hold-outs in his own party, most of who are sitting in districts Biden won, to vote for impeach and risk their own reelection.

    Further, the past impeachments have shown that there is a backlash against the party doing the impeaching. So all this seems to do is make happy a few members in safe seats at the cost of the vulnerable members of their narrow majority.
    Agree and the same could be said about Impeaching, then indicting the opposition party candidate. It’s a mess.
    Official XUHoops Resident Legal Scholar.
    (Do not take this seriously)

  3. #19123
    Supporting Member bobbiemcgee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    11,892
    McCarthy's regime so far is a clusterfuck. Doesn't have the votes to impeach. Rapist Gaetz, MTG and Boebert have him by the nuts and want him out. They will shut down the govt in 10 days.
    2023 Sweet 16

  4. #19124
    Supporting Member Strange Brew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Denver, Co
    Posts
    6,882
    Quote Originally Posted by bobbiemcgee View Post
    McCarthy's regime so far is a clusterfuck. Doesn't have the votes to impeach. Rapist Gaetz, MTG and Boebert have him by the nuts and want him out. They will shut down the govt in 10 days.
    Oh well, shut it down until it can live within its means.

    Uh Bobbie Gaetz was cleared and the left wing nutter was convicted of extortion.
    Official XUHoops Resident Legal Scholar.
    (Do not take this seriously)

  5. #19125
    When just one isnt enough X-band '01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    The Overlook Hotel
    Posts
    15,173
    I'd like to know what other speakers the Freedom Caucus have in mind should they decide to get rid of McCarthy. They'll never get one of their own to get the nomination.

    It would really be funny if a few Republicans in Democratic districts decided to vote for Hakeem Jeffries as Speaker in the interim just to give the Caucus a middle finger.

    Now another question I have for both Bobbie and Strange - how safe is Ken Buck looking for reelection? He's one of the few FC people acting sane right about now (and might find himself in the same boat as MTG if he's not careful. I know Lauren Boebert is really going to have to put her nose to the grindstone if she's going to win another term. She barely won in a year where there was supposed to be this big red wave and now the Democrats will absolutely pull all the stops to run against her.

  6. #19126
    Supporting Member Strange Brew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Denver, Co
    Posts
    6,882
    Quote Originally Posted by X-band '01 View Post
    I'd like to know what other speakers the Freedom Caucus have in mind should they decide to get rid of McCarthy. They'll never get one of their own to get the nomination.

    It would really be funny if a few Republicans in Democratic districts decided to vote for Hakeem Jeffries as Speaker in the interim just to give the Caucus a middle finger.

    Now another question I have for both Bobbie and Strange - how safe is Ken Buck looking for reelection? He's one of the few FC people acting sane right about now (and might find himself in the same boat as MTG if he's not careful. I know Lauren Boebert is really going to have to put her nose to the grindstone if she's going to win another term. She barely won in a year where there was supposed to be this big red wave and now the Democrats will absolutely pull all the stops to run against her.
    I’d assume he’s good. He primarily represents suburban Douglas County and rural areas to the East and North. Last I saw Doug Co is ~80% R and has school choice. It’s about as dark red as you can get.

    I really don’t get why people care so much about Boebert. She represents her district well if you’ve been there.
    Last edited by Strange Brew; 09-12-2023 at 04:09 PM.
    Official XUHoops Resident Legal Scholar.
    (Do not take this seriously)

  7. #19127
    When just one isnt enough X-band '01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    The Overlook Hotel
    Posts
    15,173
    Considering Boebert's district usually runs about R+10, that's not a seat that should be in play.

  8. #19128
    Supporting Member Masterofreality's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    On America's Great North Coast
    Posts
    22,953
    Quote Originally Posted by paulxu View Post
    At least with Trump there was some evidence. Phone call to pressure another country and a insurrection at the Capitol.

    Many Republicans are admitting there is no evidence to open the inquiry. In fact, the apparent purpose of the inquiry is to find evidence with which to impeach. Weak sauce.
    Once again Paul likes or purposely ignores all of the evidence already public.
    Hey Paul, you even have Joe Biden bragging publicly on tape that he interfered in a Foreign Country’s judiciary by coercing that country’s leader into firing a prosecutor who was deeply investigating a company, Burisma, for corruption- the same company that was paying his son $80,000 per month for nothing.
    The arrogant Democrats started down this path with “evidence” created out of whole cloth. You reap what you sow.
    And there is this below. Seems important…:

    https://thespectator.com/topic/the-n...ge-of-lawfare/
    "I Got CHAMPIONS in that Lockerroom!" -Stanley Burrell

  9. #19129
    Supporting Member Strange Brew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Denver, Co
    Posts
    6,882
    Quote Originally Posted by X-band '01 View Post
    Considering Boebert's district usually runs about R+10, that's not a seat that should be in play.
    Depends on how much outside money pours in I suppose. She also gets the Palin treatment by insecure little men (sorry, this is the House of Smack)
    Official XUHoops Resident Legal Scholar.
    (Do not take this seriously)

  10. #19130
    Supporting Member Strange Brew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Denver, Co
    Posts
    6,882
    Quote Originally Posted by Masterofreality View Post
    Once again Paul likes or purposely ignores all of the evidence already public.
    Hey Paul, you even have Joe Biden bragging publicly on tape that he interfered in a Foreign Country’s judiciary by coercing that country’s leader into firing a prosecutor who was deeply investigating a company, Burisma, for corruption- the same company that was paying his son $80,000 per month for nothing.
    The arrogant Democrats started down this path with “evidence” created out of whole cloth. You reap what you sow.
    And there is this below. Seems important…:

    https://thespectator.com/topic/the-n...ge-of-lawfare/
    Yeah, once the evidence sinks in you’ll hear that Joe can’t be impeached for what he did as VP only for what he did while President. I’m already seeing that one being tossed out there. Frankly, it’s not a bad argument.
    Official XUHoops Resident Legal Scholar.
    (Do not take this seriously)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •