Page 18 of 20 FirstFirst ... 81617181920 LastLast
Results 171 to 180 of 196
  1. #171
    Supporting Member D-West & PO-Z's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Montgomery
    Posts
    17,645
    Quote Originally Posted by webxu View Post
    I think the only way to achieve any sort of parity again would be to institute a salary cap for college athletics.
    You say again. Can you tell me a time when there was parity in college football/basketball? There’s always been haves and have nots.

    Cinderella stories in the tournament did not mean parity. And despite this year being chalky, the last 2-3 years were not during this NIL/portal time period.
    "I’m willing to sacrifice everything for this team. I’m going to dive for every loose ball, close out harder on every shot, block out for every rebound. I’m going to play harder than I’ve ever played. And I need you all to follow me." -MB '17

  2. #172
    Sophomore webxu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Milford
    Posts
    426
    Quote Originally Posted by D-West & PO-Z View Post
    You say again. Can you tell me a time when there was parity in college football/basketball? There’s always been haves and have nots.

    Cinderella stories in the tournament did not mean parity. And despite this year being chalky, the last 2-3 years were not during this NIL/portal time period.
    I get what you are saying I was coming from the angle of everyone having the same level playing field like the NFL. Say you have a cap of 5M to spend on a team, not everyone will use that or can use that much (Just look at the cap space the Bengals have had) but at least there is some framework around it.

  3. #173
    Senior bjf123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Section 114
    Posts
    6,197
    Quote Originally Posted by D-West & PO-Z View Post
    You say again. Can you tell me a time when there was parity in college football/basketball? There’s always been haves and have nots.

    Cinderella stories in the tournament did not mean parity. And despite this year being chalky, the last 2-3 years were not during this NIL/portal time period.
    You’ve never had parity. You’ve also never had unrestricted free agency with players bolting every year to chase more money, resulting in teams losing multiple starters not to graduation.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Golf is a relatively simple game, played by reasonably intelligent people, stupidly.

  4. #174
    Supporting Member D-West & PO-Z's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Montgomery
    Posts
    17,645
    Quote Originally Posted by webxu View Post
    I get what you are saying I was coming from the angle of everyone having the same level playing field like the NFL. Say you have a cap of 5M to spend on a team, not everyone will use that or can use that much (Just look at the cap space the Bengals have had) but at least there is some framework around it.
    Yeah I get that and agree. Not sure it will cause parity bc many teams won’t be able to spend close to the limit but understand your point and think having some sort of agreed upon cap like the rev sharing is doing is a good idea.
    "I’m willing to sacrifice everything for this team. I’m going to dive for every loose ball, close out harder on every shot, block out for every rebound. I’m going to play harder than I’ve ever played. And I need you all to follow me." -MB '17

  5. #175
    All-Conference
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    9,052
    Bottom line:

    Institutions with the deepest pockets will always have the advantage. Money and power influences, so not much has really changed. You can change all the rules you want, you won't skirt that reality.

  6. #176
    Supporting Member GoMuskies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Wichita, KS
    Posts
    36,303
    This Nico deal at Tennessee is honestly hilarious. I don't have anything against him or UT, but it's just the height of ridiculousness.

  7. #177
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    18,583
    Quote Originally Posted by GoMuskies View Post
    This Nico deal at Tennessee is honestly hilarious. I don't have anything against him or UT, but it's just the height of ridiculousness.
    Thing is, he’s not even that good probably mid pack sec qb. Not worth the money he’s asking for. If I’m a big time program, I’m avoiding him like the plague, obviously doesn’t care about winning. I like that Tennessee told him to go get fucked
    Last edited by Xville; 04-12-2025 at 12:38 PM.

  8. #178
    The Pundit response to the Nico thing is what is actually a ton more hilarious. He is being labeled average, not worth the money, not the reason why they won. At the same time the same pundits are saying Tennessee now has a gaping hole at the QB position. My mind is having trouble reconciling those two things.

  9. #179
    Supporting Member GoMuskies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Wichita, KS
    Posts
    36,303
    One casualty of the "new era" is walk-ons in certain sports. The NCAA is limiting the roster size to 20 in women's gymnastics, and as a result some walk-ons who would otherwise remain harmlessly on the team but out of the lineup are instead getting the boot.

  10. #180
    Supporting Member xubrew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    11,100
    Quote Originally Posted by GoMuskies View Post
    One casualty of the "new era" is walk-ons in certain sports. The NCAA is limiting the roster size to 20 in women's gymnastics, and as a result some walk-ons who would otherwise remain harmlessly on the team but out of the lineup are instead getting the boot.
    I have a feeling this will soon be challenged.
    "You can't fix stupid." Ron White

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •