Page 2642 of 2646 FirstFirst ... 1642214225422592263226402641264226432644 ... LastLast
Results 26,411 to 26,420 of 26456

Thread: Politics Thread

  1. #26411
    Junior
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    2,597
    Quote Originally Posted by GoMuskies View Post
    For the love of all that is holy, PLEASE find the ignore feature!
    I guess you like being blatantly lied to then?
    When they say, “We must protect our democracy,” switch the word “democracy” to “bureaucracy”, and it will all make sense.

  2. #26412
    Supporting Member paulxu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    21,349
    This is awesome. Only a true genius could do this all by himself without a recession or pandemic. MAGA!

    ...he went up late, and I was already up there.

  3. #26413
    Supporting Member Strange Brew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Denver, Co
    Posts
    6,882
    Quote Originally Posted by paulxu View Post
    This is awesome. Only a true genius could do this all by himself without a recession or pandemic. MAGA!

    Not trying to be a jerk however you may want to look into the UofM methodology and history.
    Official XUHoops Resident Legal Scholar.
    (Do not take this seriously)

  4. #26414
    Supporting Member 94GRAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Dana's
    Posts
    3,744
    Quote Originally Posted by GoMuskies View Post
    For the love of all that is holy, PLEASE find the ignore feature!
    I second this motion. This motion has passed!!!!
    Mama always told me, stupid is as stupid does. @danagardens

  5. #26415
    Supporting Member paulxu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    21,349
    The information was published with commentary in the Financial Times, a respected publication that has been in business since 1888.
    The U of M has been doing the survey since 1946. What problem is there with methodology and history?
    It's also reviewed by Fox since you don't apparently believe facts on CNN.

    https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/...umer-sentiment
    ...he went up late, and I was already up there.

  6. #26416
    Supporting Member Strange Brew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Denver, Co
    Posts
    6,882
    Quote Originally Posted by paulxu View Post
    The information was published with commentary in the Financial Times, a respected publication that has been in business since 1888.
    The U of M has been doing the survey since 1946. What problem is there with methodology and history?
    It's also reviewed by Fox since you don't apparently believe facts on CNN.

    https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/...umer-sentiment
    No recession listed in '22/'23 is a good start.

    Next you're going to say Krugman is still highly respected....:)

    Edit: Are you saying one opinion poll is a "fact"?
    Last edited by Strange Brew; 04-11-2025 at 02:56 PM.
    Official XUHoops Resident Legal Scholar.
    (Do not take this seriously)

  7. #26417
    Sophomore
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    2,196
    Quote Originally Posted by 94GRAD View Post
    I second this motion. This motion has passed!!!!
    +1

  8. #26418
    Supporting Member waggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Gold Country
    Posts
    11,587
    This is a few months old, but worth a watch


  9. #26419
    Supporting Member paulxu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    21,349
    I wonder if the Dow is down over 8% since Jan 21st?
    Perhaps it's something Paul Krugman and CNN made up.
    Guess I need to look into that.
    ...he went up late, and I was already up there.

  10. #26420
    Supporting Member Strange Brew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Denver, Co
    Posts
    6,882
    Quote Originally Posted by paulxu View Post
    I wonder if the Dow is down over 8% since Jan 21st?
    Perhaps it's something Paul Krugman and CNN made up.
    Guess I need to look into that.
    Because of the tariffs and the Market has been overvalued for the past 12-18 mos or so (likely because value is pegged to the Reserve Note).

    The P/E ratios are wild these days….

    I’ll withhold judgement on the tariffs for a couple of months and I’m happy to admit if I’m wrong for supporting the move if it blows up. That said, the status quo wasn’t sustainable much longer either.

    As a reminder, I’ve admitted I was wrong for buying into the WMD narrative (pushed by Krugman’s former bosses btw).

    If nothing else China knows we’re not going to put up with all of the bs anymore.

    Edit: Stop hiding behind “experts”. If you don’t know, you don’t know. And that’s ok.
    Last edited by Strange Brew; 04-12-2025 at 01:14 AM.
    Official XUHoops Resident Legal Scholar.
    (Do not take this seriously)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •