Page 15 of 22 FirstFirst ... 51314151617 ... LastLast
Results 141 to 150 of 218
  1. #141
    Freshman
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    166
    Quote Originally Posted by Xville View Post
    Honestly, I thought Claude would be a loss but I didn't think it would be to this point. I thought that at the time because I thought Swain would have developed offesnively a lot more than he has, and I thought he'd be playing his natural position at the 3. We have serious issues because 1.) Swain is playing out of position. 2.) So is free. 3.) We don't have anyone that can play the 5 because Hugley has been down right awful and Traore got hurt. 4.) Dayvion has regressed the last few games. He's been crap.

    Foster shouldn't be starting, and on a good high d1 team, he wouldn't be. He's a good 6-7 man, not a starter. He doesn't bring much to the table. I really think our lineup needs to be moved around a bit. I know he hasn't been great but either insert Jerome at the 4/5 to play with Free and move Swain to 3 with the current guards, or go smaller with Maddox and Dayvion at the guards and slide Conwell over to the 3. The starting lineup just isn't working.
    That’s an honest answer . Your Board nemesis claims this team has talent and Sean is a bad coach …implying that a good coach could win with this roster. What am I missing ? The only “ coaching” related disappointment is Swain . He has not developed. You can attribute it to playing out of position. I attribute it to a lack of basketball maturation and confidence. And that relates to coaching.

  2. #142
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    16,802
    Quote Originally Posted by A Fan View Post
    That’s an honest answer . Your Board nemesis claims this team has talent and Sean is a bad coach …implying that a good coach could win with this roster. What am I missing ? The only “ coaching” related disappointment is Swain . He has not developed. You can attribute it to playing out of position. I attribute it to a lack of basketball maturation and confidence. And that relates to coaching.
    I think there is plenty of talent on the team to make the tournament. I don't think Sean is a bad coach by any means, but he doesn't seem to be pushing the right buttons either. He seems to be a very different coach this time around than he was the first time, and while he's now a nice guy, I'm not sure I love the style...its a little too ho-hum for me. Not saying he needs to be Hurley flopping around like an idiot, but some of the fire/intensity seems to be gone, and I think the players are a reflection of how they are being coached.

    Plenty of time left in the season to right the ship, but its gotta be pretty soon because the schedule is about to get real.

  3. #143
    Supporting Member bleedXblue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    7,689
    Quote Originally Posted by A Fan View Post
    That’s an honest answer . Your Board nemesis claims this team has talent and Sean is a bad coach …implying that a good coach could win with this roster. What am I missing ? The only “ coaching” related disappointment is Swain . He has not developed. You can attribute it to playing out of position. I attribute it to a lack of basketball maturation and confidence. And that relates to coaching.
    You only see it in Swain? I mean the offense is hard to watch as a whole and defensively we're getting exposed inside and almost any time someone gets inside the paint? I call this part of coaching the tactical piece. Thats where Sean hasn't figured it out

  4. #144
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    16,802
    Quote Originally Posted by bleedXblue View Post
    You only see it in Swain? I mean the offense is hard to watch as a whole and defensively we're getting exposed inside and almost any time someone gets inside the paint? I call this part of coaching the tactical piece. Thats where Sean hasn't figured it out
    I'd love for the packline to be put out to pasture. Most coaches that used to play it, have scrapped it. There are too many shooters in college basketball for it to work effectively night in and night out. Go to a matchup zone, or pressure d...anything else.

  5. #145
    Supporting Member bleedXblue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    7,689
    Quote Originally Posted by Xville View Post
    I'd love for the packline to be put out to pasture. Most coaches that used to play it, have scrapped it. There are too many shooters in college basketball for it to work effectively night in and night out. Go to a matchup zone, or pressure d...anything else.
    this 1000000%

    I mean we have guys that excel in the open court, so why would you play more pressure?

  6. #146
    When just one isnt enough X-band '01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    The Overlook Hotel
    Posts
    14,938
    Quote Originally Posted by Xville View Post
    Honestly, I thought Claude would be a loss but I didn't think it would be to this point. I thought that at the time because I thought Swain would have developed offesnively a lot more than he has, and I thought he'd be playing his natural position at the 3. We have serious issues because 1.) Swain is playing out of position. 2.) So is free. 3.) We don't have anyone that can play the 5 because Hugley has been down right awful and Traore got hurt. 4.) Dayvion has regressed the last few games. He's been crap.

    Foster shouldn't be starting, and on a good high d1 team, he wouldn't be. He's a good 6-7 man, not a starter. He doesn't bring much to the table. I really think our lineup needs to be moved around a bit. I know he hasn't been great but either insert Jerome at the 4/5 to play with Free and move Swain to 3 with the current guards, or go smaller with Maddox and Dayvion at the guards and slide Conwell over to the 3. The starting lineup just isn't working.

    Last thing...outside of the buy-game this schedule starts to get really brutal. It's gut check time...next 5-6 games can completely sink the season if they don't get their shit together.
    Keep in mind that Foster started on a Furman team that beat Virginia in the NCAA Tournament 2 years ago. He is a capable starter, although there are going to be rough patches along the way. Even Jerome Hunter wasn't consistently great 2 years ago, but he clearly did get better as the stakes got higher after Freemantle's injury.

    What is more concerning is how this team constantly runs out of gas at the end of games for 3 games straight. That can't go on.

  7. #147
    I do not think giving Conwell the green light helps X. We had some better balanced scoring last night but TCU was aggresivelly defending Conwell and at many times X could not turn that into a frre wide opoen X player. Sometimes that worked.
    I know last night was sad but I thought there were some positives.
    X needs to not have luek warm halves rebounding and playing defense.

    Maybe a solid post player outside of X would be a difference maker.

    So maybe X can win teh NIT tourney this yeart and next year be good enough for a Sweet 16 push. Obviously Miller's teams cannot be top notch with all these transfers.

  8. #148
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    16,802
    Quote Originally Posted by X-band '01 View Post
    Keep in mind that Foster started on a Furman team that beat Virginia in the NCAA Tournament 2 years ago. He is a capable starter, although there are going to be rough patches along the way. Even Jerome Hunter wasn't consistently great 2 years ago, but he clearly did get better as the stakes got higher after Freemantle's injury.

    What is more concerning is how this team constantly runs out of gas at the end of games for 3 games straight. That can't go on.
    I don't see how Foster starting at Furman has any bearing on whether he should be starting at this level or not. Furman's leading scorer last year is at Auburn now and barely gets off the bench. This is a different animal.

    I hope im wrong and Foster is fine once he gets more comfortable with his role. I know he does a lot of the little things here and there, but from what i can see he doesn't have high d1 talent. I don't remember people being all that excited about him when he came on board.

    As a fan I'm just extremely frustrated with this program, I don't like the feeling of treading water that we have been doing now for a very long time. I can't imagine what the high dollar NIL donors feel, they should have just lit their money on fire.

  9. #149
    Supporting Member paulxu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    20,934
    Quote Originally Posted by X-band '01 View Post
    What is more concerning is how this team constantly runs out of gas at the end of games for 3 games straight. That can't go on.
    I think that only gets worse if we are only 6 deep.
    ...he went up late, and I was already up there.

  10. #150
    Supporting Member xubrew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    10,755
    Quote Originally Posted by Xville View Post
    I don't see how Foster starting at Furman has any bearing on whether he should be starting at this level or not. Furman's leading scorer last year is at Auburn now and barely gets off the bench. This is a different animal.

    I hope im wrong and Foster is fine once he gets more comfortable with his role. I know he does a lot of the little things here and there, but from what i can see he doesn't have high d1 talent. I don't remember people being all that excited about him when he came on board.

    As a fan I'm just extremely frustrated with this program, I don't like the feeling of treading water that we have been doing now for a very long time. I can't imagine what the high dollar NIL donors feel, they should have just lit their money on fire.
    I think the Furman team that Foster played on two years ago would beat this year's Xavier team. Just sayin'.
    "You can't fix stupid." Ron White

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •