Politics Thread

[Xville]

Keep yapping. An insider whistleblower Tony Bobulinski, who no one has claimed is lying, verified that “The Big Guy” reference was true. By the way. No White House denials, still.
I would think that since you always seemed to want to believe “whistleblowers” that were on your side against Trump, that you would also do the same thing here “in fairness”
Biden Indictment 2023 on the way. Lead witness? Tony Bobulinski et al.

Not saying ole Joe is responsible or not, but where is the actual credible evidence Joe was involved? Because "scorned lover," Tony said so? All credibility goes out the window once you come on to Fox News to blab to Tucker Carlson imo...it's the same credibility loss as going on Rachel Maddow's show.

Just like with Trump, this will take some time with Biden if he is indicted...to speak in absolutes, as you are doing, is quite absurd.

[XU_Lou]

I just love lazy analysis....

[paulxu]

I wondered where this Bobulinksi stuff came from.
2 years ago in October 2020, he was all over Fox with his allegations. Everybody looked at them.

The Wall Street Journal reviewed his documents and found no evidence of wrongdoing by Joe Biden — or that he was active in his family’s foreign business endeavors, as Bobulinski claimed.

This was followed by:

Carlson ran a follow-up segment the next night, claiming Fox News had procured additional documents related to Hunter Biden but that they went missing in the mail.

(This is a variation on a theme....The Dog Ate My Homework, by Dr. Oz)
This gigantic deflection before the last election is now being re-run in all the usual places; Fox, NY Post, Daily Mail, etc.
Maybe it'll get more traction in the mid-term election this time.
Bobulinski's deal with Hunter in China fell through. Maybe he should have partnered with the Trump family. Jared made a cool 2 billion from the Saudi's.

[Xville]

I just love lazy analysis....

we know. It's your specialty. unsubstantiated Link followed by link followed by another link regardless if there are any facts in the link or not. Then, unfounded commentary on said links.

[XU_Lou]

we know. It's your specialty. unsubstantiated Link followed by link followed by another link regardless if there are any facts in the link or not. Then, unfounded commentary on said links.

You offer nothing of any substance whatsoever to any of the discussions on this thread. Your constant blabbering about sources, the viewpoints of posters (almost exclusively of those on the right), and “the truth is somewhere in the middle” is so tiresome and lazy.

If you don’t have the mental faculties to offer an intelligent rebuttal to an assertion, then maybe you should just shut the fuck up. As someone else already said to you, maybe you should post less and read more, because it’s obvious you don’t know shit about anything.

[Xville]

You offer nothing of any substance whatsoever to any of the discussions on this thread. Your constant blabbering about sources, the viewpoints of posters (almost exclusively of those on the right), and “the truth is somewhere in the middle” is so tiresome and lazy.

If you don’t have the mental faculties to offer an intelligent rebuttal to an assertion, then maybe you should just shut the fuck up. As someone else already said to you, maybe you should post less and read more, because it’s obvious you don’t know shit about anything.

Where's your link, lying lou?

The irony here is outstanding. An intelligent rebuttal is not needed when someone is posting a bunch of non substantiated opinions and passing it off as fact.

You cite Strange Brew as an example who still doesn't think the Supreme Court interprets the Constitution.

[XU_Lou]

80% of polls and stats are crap

Oh, this is a gem!

So, ville, just to be clear, is this “stat” you quoted part of the 80%, or the 20%? I’ll hang up and listen offline…

[Xville]

Oh, this is a gem!

So, ville, just to be clear, is this “stat” you quoted part of the 80%, or the 20%? I’ll hang up and listen offline…

That was a joke you clueless idiot.

Maybe I should have wrote it in a word doc, hyperlinked it, and then posted that link here so you could read it to understand.

[XU_Lou]

That was a joke you clueless idiot

Did anyone laugh...other than at you for making another stupid comment...

[XU_Lou]

Where's your link, lying lou?

The irony here is outstanding. An intelligent rebuttal is not needed when someone is posting a bunch of non substantiated opinions and passing it off as fact.

You cite Strange Brew as an example who still doesn't think the Supreme Court interprets the Constitution.

Did you forget willie:

And funny you claim to be middle of the road. You’re about as bad as Bobbie and Paul these days.