Page 1296 of 2647 FirstFirst ... 2967961196124612861294129512961297129813061346139617962296 ... LastLast
Results 12,951 to 12,960 of 26463

Thread: Politics Thread

  1. #12951
    Supporting Member Masterofreality's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    On America's Great North Coast
    Posts
    22,953
    Quote Originally Posted by Muskie in dayton View Post
    agree censuring is ridiculous. We have primaries for that.

    I don’t agree it’s only one party.
    https://www.npr.org/2022/01/22/10750...ilibuster-vote
    Yeah. Amazing how myopic Paul is, huh?
    "I Got CHAMPIONS in that Lockerroom!" -Stanley Burrell

  2. #12952
    Senior bjf123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Section 114
    Posts
    6,200
    The really sad part is you have both parties censuring people in their own party for not blindly following the party line. I applaud each of them for doing what they think is best for the country, not what the party wants. It really should be country first, then party. Sadly, that’s no lo fee the case. Both parties expect blind adherence to whatever BS the party leadership spews forth.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Golf is a relatively simple game, played by reasonably intelligent people, stupidly.

  3. #12953
    Supporting Member paulxu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    21,351
    I wasn't commenting on censuring per se.
    I was commenting on the reasoning for the censure, that a riot is legitimate political discourse in the eyes of one party.

    A riot should never be legitimate political discourse, and the fact that one party thinks it is...is not good for our country.

    (And I sort of thought that would have been apparent from my comment. Guess not.)
    ...he went up late, and I was already up there.

  4. #12954
    Supporting Member Strange Brew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Denver, Co
    Posts
    6,883
    Quote Originally Posted by paulxu View Post
    I wasn't commenting on censuring per se.
    I was commenting on the reasoning for the censure, that a riot is legitimate political discourse in the eyes of one party.

    A riot should never be legitimate political discourse, and the fact that one party thinks it is...is not good for our country.

    (And I sort of thought that would have been apparent from my comment. Guess not.)
    Huh, seems like a Party accepted and cheered rioting for most of 2020.
    Official XUHoops Resident Legal Scholar.
    (Do not take this seriously)

  5. #12955
    Supporting Member Masterofreality's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    On America's Great North Coast
    Posts
    22,953
    Quote Originally Posted by paulxu View Post
    I wasn't commenting on censuring per se.
    I was commenting on the reasoning for the censure, that a riot is legitimate political discourse in the eyes of one party.

    A riot should never be legitimate political discourse, and the fact that one party thinks it is...is not good for our country.

    (And I sort of thought that would have been apparent from my comment. Guess not.)
    Hmmm. Where were your comments during the summer of 2020 when Kenosha, Portland, Chicago, Minneapolis amongst many other cities were being burned
    to the ground and many Businesses owned by People of Color were destroyed? Oh, and when the current Vice President was promoting a fund to bail rioters out of jail?

    Seems as if Democrats sure thought that "riots were legitimate discourse" at that time.
    Nothing was destroyed in the "Capitol Riots". Billions were destroyed in the "Riots of 2020"
    Stop being disingenuous.
    "I Got CHAMPIONS in that Lockerroom!" -Stanley Burrell

  6. #12956
    Supporting Member paulxu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    21,351
    I'm pretty sure you'll not find a comment on here from me, where I said riots are a legitimate political discourse.

    That you want to imply that I may think that...is the real example of being disingenuous. You can't bring yourself to say riots are not legitimate discourse, so you are agreeing with the RNC.

    I have no such reservations; riots are NOT legitimate political discourse.
    ...he went up late, and I was already up there.

  7. #12957
    Supporting Member Strange Brew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Denver, Co
    Posts
    6,883
    Quote Originally Posted by paulxu View Post
    I'm pretty sure you'll not find a comment on here from me, where I said riots are a legitimate political discourse.

    That you want to imply that I may think that...is the real example of being disingenuous. You can't bring yourself to say riots are not legitimate discourse, so you are agreeing with the RNC.

    I have no such reservations; riots are NOT legitimate political discourse.
    You stated more than once that riots as political discourse are accepted by one Party. Which is nonsense and par for the course from you.

    At least we agree that riots are bad.
    Official XUHoops Resident Legal Scholar.
    (Do not take this seriously)

  8. #12958
    Supporting Member paulxu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    21,351
    It is nonsense; which is why it's surprising that a national party would adopt that position.
    ...he went up late, and I was already up there.

  9. #12959
    Supporting Member Strange Brew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Denver, Co
    Posts
    6,883
    Quote Originally Posted by paulxu View Post
    It is nonsense; which is why it's surprising that a national party would adopt that position.
    Agree, which is why it's surprising both National Parties have adopted that position at varying points..
    Official XUHoops Resident Legal Scholar.
    (Do not take this seriously)

  10. #12960
    Supporting Member paulxu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    21,351
    I haven't seen the DNC adopt that position, but I'll go along with these former Ambassadors, Admirals, officials, Congressmen and Senators:

    The RNC’s description of the January 6th insurrection as “legitimate political discourse” is an affront to the rule of law, peaceful self-government, and the constitutional order.
    https://renewamericamovement.com/sta...and-kinzinger/

    I feel fairly certain you won't find a set of Democratic officials, banded together to express this sort of opinion about the DNC.
    ...he went up late, and I was already up there.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •