Page 435 of 2647 FirstFirst ... 3353854254334344354364374454855359351435 ... LastLast
Results 4,341 to 4,350 of 26463

Thread: Politics Thread

  1. #4341
    Supporting Member X-man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Now in Section 106 (Row L), after stints in Sections 104 and 105.
    Posts
    3,420
    So Fox isn't "fair and balanced" after all. Who knew??? Link: https://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...for-us-anymore.
    Xavier always goes to the NCAA tournament...Projecting anything less than that this season feels like folly--Eamonn Brennan, ESPN (Summer Shootaround, 2012)

  2. #4342
    Junior
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Indy
    Posts
    3,308
    Quote Originally Posted by Muskie in dayton View Post
    High school academic performance is a much better indicator of college performance than standardized tests. The only money grab is on the part of standardized test services and the places that teach kids how to beat the tests.

    Great decision by X.
    The fallacy of this is some high schools are much easier than others. A's at some schools would be C's at other schools. Hence, the standardized test.

  3. #4343
    Sophomore XUOWNSUC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    2,058
    Quote Originally Posted by JTG View Post
    The fallacy of this is some high schools are much easier than others. A's at some schools would be C's at other schools. Hence, the standardized test.
    Xavier should have a pretty good idea of which schools are which. Plus, they should have a ton of data showing which students from which schools fair the best when they come to Xavier. It isn't hard.

    Why should they give a ton of weight to a stupid test that is taken during ONE day and that can be "gamed" by students taking review/prep classes?

    My wife didn't take a review/prep course and barely got over 1000 on her SAT. She had a 4.0 at Xavier. Shows you how accurate they are.

    The tests suck and I'm glad Xavier doesn't care that much about them any more.

  4. #4344
    Sophomore
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    2,111
    Quote Originally Posted by Caf View Post
    How is it a money grab that looks bad?
    It looks bad for a number of reasons. On the surface it just looks like they’re abolishing admissions standards and any schmuck can get in now. From the money perspective it looks like a way to skirt admissions standards and inflate enrollment

  5. #4345
    Supporting Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Springboro OH
    Posts
    1,808
    Quote Originally Posted by scoscox View Post
    It looks bad for a number of reasons. On the surface it just looks like they’re abolishing admissions standards and any schmuck can get in now. From the money perspective it looks like a way to skirt admissions standards and inflate enrollment
    Because they scrap a poor indicator of college performance, they somehow are compromising admission standards? That makes no sense.
    "...treat 'em with respect, or get out of the Gym!"

  6. #4346
    Sophomore
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    2,111
    Wouldn’t eliminating an admissions requirement based on an academic test qualify as something that may compromise admission standards? I don’t think that was out of line. Maybe you can enlighten me

    Also what source are you citing with your claim about them not being a good predictor of performance?

  7. #4347
    Junior
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Indy
    Posts
    3,308
    Quote Originally Posted by scoscox View Post
    It looks bad for a number of reasons. On the surface it just looks like they’re abolishing admissions standards and any schmuck can get in now. From the money perspective it looks like a way to skirt admissions standards and inflate enrollment
    Don't we as as alums yearn for a student body made up of trust fund dummies ? As for gaming the tests, you can also game classes, once your in college.

  8. #4348
    Supporting Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Springboro OH
    Posts
    1,808
    Quote Originally Posted by scoscox View Post
    Wouldn’t eliminating an admissions requirement based on an academic test qualify as something that may compromise admission standards? I don’t think that was out of line. Maybe you can enlighten me

    Also what source are you citing with your claim about them not being a good predictor of performance?
    OK, here’s a few:
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...?noredirect=on
    https://news.psu.edu/story/165456/20...icator-success
    https://growingleaders.com/blog/do-s...udent-success/
    http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/op_ed...t_predict.html
    https://qz.com/853128/grades-not-iq-...uture-success/
    https://bized.aacsb.edu/articles/201...tudent-success

    I also base this on my experience and conversations over the year with friends, neighbors and co-workers on this topic.

    When my daughter was looking at colleges, we also looked into those ACT/SAT prep classes. They guaranteed if I gave them a few thousand $ for her to take their class, her scores would go up by at least 5 points. So effectively I could pay for someone to show her how to game the test. This is nothing but a “lite” version of what those Hollywood stars are going to jail for.

    Oh, by the way, I did find a few sources indicating what a great indicator standardized test scores are of college success. You guessed it - the places selling the “test prep” classes... Yeah.
    "...treat 'em with respect, or get out of the Gym!"

  9. #4349
    Sophomore
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    2,111
    Prep classes are a total scam sure and no doubt those companies are trying to turn a buck but I don’t see it as some sort of out of control racket. Thanks for the sources

  10. #4350
    Supporting Member paulxu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    21,351
    This is a little off the subject, but prep classes for the bar exam seem to be beneficial.
    ...he went up late, and I was already up there.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •