Is it really a cut? As WaPo points out "The new tax break for millionaires goes beyond what was in the original House and Senate bills, with Republicans seeking to ensure wealthy earners in states such as New York, Connecticut and California don't end up paying substantially higher taxes as a result of the bill."
Results 2,781 to 2,790 of 26472
Thread: Politics Thread
-
08-30-2018, 04:34 PM #2781
-
08-30-2018, 04:41 PM #2782
Yes, the Blue States with high real estate prices , sales tax, property tax, etc. were penalized. And they can't deduct their Yacht interest anymore. What a burden. The rate for the super rich dropped from 39.6 to 37%.
2023 Sweet 16
-
08-30-2018, 04:45 PM #2783
The rate changed, but only because it otherwise was going to be a huge tax increase. I don't think this is a net tax cut for the super rich as a whole. I suppose it's great for the super rich in Texas, Nevada and Florida, though.
-
08-30-2018, 08:09 PM #2784
However we slice it, it is (at least) at third shot at the failed trickle down nonsense.
What was really wrong with the tax levels for individuals and corporations in 2000?
People were doing as well as they could (despite stagnant middle class wages) but...we had a balanced federal budget, with a surplus!!
A chance to actually be fiscally conservative as I hear the Republicans talk about all the time, as they slash taxes and increase spending.
We missed a golden opportunity to actually pay down some of the national debt.
And now we don't have enough for a small raise for federal workers after cutting taxes? What a scam has been pulled on this country....he went up late, and I was already up there.
-
08-30-2018, 08:44 PM #2785
At no point did the feds actually bring in more than they spent. The surplus was projected which was due to a R Congress.
We have plenty of money. Make cuts elsewhere. If Fed workers are pissed they can get a job in the BOOMING PROVATE ECONMY!
At this point I’ll take deficits and more money in my pocket over paying more for the gov’t to mismanage money (Obama’s/leftist demand side utter, complete and dismal failure. Which was easily predictable if you’re not stupid).Last edited by Strange Brew; 08-30-2018 at 08:48 PM.
-
08-30-2018, 08:55 PM #2786
You might want to check out 1998,99,2000, and 2001.
https://www.taxpolicycenter.org/stat...outlay-summary
I'm curious...do you actually believe in trickle down?...he went up late, and I was already up there.
-
08-30-2018, 08:59 PM #2787
Tax policy center? Was the center for American progress unavailable?
Before I answer can you explain what you think it means?
Also, this year’s tax receipts are similar to 2016. So bringing in the same amount of money while people keep more of THEIR cash seems good to me. Cut spending if you care about budgets.Last edited by Strange Brew; 08-30-2018 at 09:01 PM.
-
08-30-2018, 09:09 PM #2788
What is wrong with you? Did you even look at that table, and look at the source.
It's copied from the Office of Management and Budget at the Whitehouse.
Here's the link. Go to table 1.3 and download the excel file and look at it.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/historical-tables/...he went up late, and I was already up there.
-
08-30-2018, 11:04 PM #2789
-
08-31-2018, 12:10 AM #2790
Yes. Truth isn't truth. Maybe the farmers will give up their 12 billion from Trump (bcuz China didn't cave to his demands) for the lousy inflation rate pay raises.
Last edited by bobbiemcgee; 08-31-2018 at 12:22 AM.
2023 Sweet 16
Bookmarks