Page 39 of 41 FirstFirst ... 293738394041 LastLast
Results 381 to 390 of 403

Thread: Sean Miller

  1. #381
    Freshman
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    177
    If my memory serves me correctly it was Miller who first brought pack line to X.

  2. #382
    All-Conference
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    9,009
    Quote Originally Posted by Xavier View Post
    I think he got out coached actually. They wanted to see if Swain could beat them. Not to say I don’t think Miller is a good coach just that he got out coached there.
    Agree.

    They left Swain alone and made sure no one else beat them. The gameplan was to allow him to get some points. And Sean left Swain in for most of the game. Essentially playing 4 on 5 where they didn't have to guard someone. Good coaches will always attack that.

    Played right into it.

    The less educated eye would say "Swain had the best game of his career, how can you say that"? It was designed that way.
    Last edited by drudy23; 03-28-2025 at 09:33 PM.

  3. #383
    Supporting Member GoMuskies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Wichita, KS
    Posts
    36,203
    Swain scored 27 points on 10-17 shooting. Hard to call that playing 4 on 5. Why would Miller have taken Swain out? Who was going to do better than that?

  4. #384
    Sophomore
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    FL, on the Cape
    Posts
    1,258
    Quote Originally Posted by GoMuskies View Post
    Swain scored 27 points on 10-17 shooting. Hard to call that playing 4 on 5. Why would Miller have taken Swain out? Who was going to do better than that?
    Well, not RJ Luis.
    Bjork Vanishes After Fan Tricks Her Into Saying Name Backwards ~ TheHardTimes.netb

  5. #385
    All-Conference
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    9,009
    Quote Originally Posted by GoMuskies View Post
    Swain scored 27 points on 10-17 shooting. Hard to call that playing 4 on 5. Why would Miller have taken Swain out? Who was going to do better than that?
    You take him out because they flat weren't guarding him. That's why none of our 3 point shooters could gets looks. Everyone else was focused on them. When you don't have to guard one guy, a good coach start salivating.

    It wasn't a matter of "who would have done better than that" - it was a matter of eliminating Swain from the equation as it would have forced them to guard all 5 guys, and potentially opened it up. Never really happened.

    They basically ignored Swain, overplayed our shooters (that's why we had some many attempts at the rim), and let their 7 footer disrupt our small team at the rim, which is exactly what happened. Could't finish in the paint.

    That's why Swain had 27 - he wasn't guarded.

  6. #386
    Supporting Member GoMuskies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Wichita, KS
    Posts
    36,203
    Yeah, I don't think their plan was for Swain to get an efficient 27. Worked anyway because we otherwise sucked.

    Creighton actually employed the same strategy to better results (on the actual strategy), but we still won against them.

  7. #387
    Junior
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    4,733
    I think it worked perfectly. Saying let’s see if he can beat us, he has his best night of his career and we got smoked. They’d do the same thing again.

    Granted, we lost because of the other side of the ball. It was just bad all around

  8. #388
    Quote Originally Posted by drudy23 View Post
    You take him out because they flat weren't guarding him. That's why none of our 3 point shooters could gets looks. Everyone else was focused on them. When you don't have to guard one guy, a good coach start salivating.

    It wasn't a matter of "who would have done better than that" - it was a matter of eliminating Swain from the equation as it would have forced them to guard all 5 guys, and potentially opened it up. Never really happened.

    They basically ignored Swain, overplayed our shooters (that's why we had some many attempts at the rim), and let their 7 footer disrupt our small team at the rim, which is exactly what happened. Could't finish in the paint.

    That's why Swain had 27 - he wasn't guarded.
    All accurate

  9. #389
    Supporting Member D-West & PO-Z's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Montgomery
    Posts
    17,569
    I don’t think they expected their strategy to result in 27 for swain on the shooting % he shot.

    Also his guy was sagging off on the paint, not an extra guy guarding our shooters. Swain got into the lane anyway and scored. He did hit a couple unexpected 3’s as well.

    Their plan was the guy can’t shoot and if he does he will miss and if he drives it will be difficult bc his defender is there waiting.
    "I’m willing to sacrifice everything for this team. I’m going to dive for every loose ball, close out harder on every shot, block out for every rebound. I’m going to play harder than I’ve ever played. And I need you all to follow me." -MB '17

  10. #390
    Quote Originally Posted by D-West & PO-Z View Post
    I don’t think they expected their strategy to result in 27 for swain on the shooting % he shot.

    Also his guy was sagging off on the paint, not an extra guy guarding our shooters. Swain got into the lane anyway and scored. He did hit a couple unexpected 3’s as well.

    Their plan was the guy can’t shoot and if he does he will miss and if he drives it will be difficult bc his defender is there waiting.
    But they were on fire from 3. So trade that all night. If the game would have tightened up, they probably change up the strategy and put some effort into swain. But until that time, why adjust away from what works.

    No doubt they had no respect for swain, and he put up big numbers while we got crushed.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •