Page 58 of 81 FirstFirst ... 848565758596068 ... LastLast
Results 571 to 580 of 806
  1. #571
    Supporting Member xubrew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    10,996
    Quote Originally Posted by drudy23 View Post
    It's going to be a nerve wracking week.
    X gets to keep playing until someone beats them. If they keep winning then it doesn't have to be nerve-racking.
    "You can't fix stupid." Ron White

  2. #572
    Supporting Member GoMuskies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Wichita, KS
    Posts
    35,918
    Another reason to want to win 2 or 3 (wouldn't that be glorious?) times this week: let's stay the hell away from Dayon!

  3. #573
    Senior bjf123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Section 114
    Posts
    6,085
    Quote Originally Posted by noteggs View Post
    Not to mention he referred the tournament as P4 teams playing their way in or out. WTF? However Norlander did say P5, but wonder if other committee feel same?
    I thought the same thing. A bit of a bias towards the football power conferences.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Golf is a relatively simple game, played by reasonably intelligent people, stupidly.

  4. #574
    Supporting Member GoMuskies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Wichita, KS
    Posts
    35,918
    Perhaps Cunningham was excluding the ACC from the list of power conferences since it's such garbage this year.

  5. #575
    Supporting Member waggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Gold Country
    Posts
    11,476
    X is in about 70% of bracketologist projections right now and I expect that to increase throughout the week prior to the game against Marquette. However, given Cunningham is the chair of the committee I would consider X out of the tournament right now, because UNC is very likely to get in even with a small run. Their first tournament game is against the Notre Dame/Pitt winner.

  6. #576
    All-Conference
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    8,886
    Betting odds to make the tournament for a bunch of teams:

    Xavier - 81%
    Indiana - 99%
    VCU - 81%
    Arkansas - 85%
    Vanderbilt - 99%
    Baylor - 69%
    NMU - 62%
    Ohio St - 61%
    SDSU - 71%
    Oklahoma - 98%
    UNC - 47%
    Boise - 21%
    UC - 0%
    Last edited by drudy23; 03-10-2025 at 12:46 PM.

  7. #577
    Supporting Member xubrew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    10,996
    Quote Originally Posted by noteggs View Post
    Not to mention he referred the tournament as P4 teams playing their way in or out. WTF? However Norlander did say P5, but wonder if other committee feel same?
    He is an AD. When any administrator or NCAA staffer refers to the P4, they are referring to the four conferences with autonomy. They aren't looking at it the way a fan does in terms of overall strength in a specific sport.
    "You can't fix stupid." Ron White

  8. #578
    Supporting Member xubrew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    10,996
    Quote Originally Posted by waggy View Post
    X is in about 70% of bracketologist projections right now and I expect that to increase throughout the week prior to the game against Marquette. However, given Cunningham is the chair of the committee I would consider X out of the tournament right now, because UNC is very likely to get in even with a small run. Their first tournament game is against the Notre Dame/Pitt winner.
    I think Xavier would get in if today were Selection Sunday. I also think that Xavier is playing better now than what their profile indicates. It took them a while to get fully up to speed, but they are now fully up to speed. It wouldn't shock me to see them win a game in the Big East Tournament. Or two. Or, maybe even one more than two. They've either beaten all the best teams in the league in the stretch run of the season, or they've had those teams on the ropes on the road.

    I don't think North Carolina gets in without winning the ACC or somehow beating Duke prior to the final. Every year there is all this alarm over who is on the committee or who is chairing it, and it's never really been a factor that I can tell. Dan Gavitt, David Worlock, and other NCAA staffers are in there. Even if they wanted to the committee members can't just blatantly cut deals with each other. Kentucky's AD was on the committee one year when both Kentucky and La Salle were on the bubble. Everyone was certain Kentucky was going to get selected because of favoritism and they didn't. La Salle did get in. Taking La Salle over Kentucky when Kentucky's AD is on the committee was a pretty strong sign to me that there are guard rails in place to keep that from happening. I for one am not going to get bent out of shape about UNC getting in until it actually happens.
    "You can't fix stupid." Ron White

  9. #579
    Supporting Member waggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Gold Country
    Posts
    11,476
    While bracketologist have X at 70% to 30% in favor of X at the moment, that is based on a large group where any bias pressure is small and diluted. On a 12 person committee where bias is possible it could mean just 1 or 2 votes. UNC doesn't have to get 100% votes. Just 7 of 12.

  10. #580
    Quote Originally Posted by xubrew View Post
    I think Xavier would get in if today were Selection Sunday. I also think that Xavier is playing better now than what their profile indicates. It took them a while to get fully up to speed, but they are now fully up to speed. It wouldn't shock me to see them win a game in the Big East Tournament. Or two. Or, maybe even one more than two. They've either beaten all the best teams in the league in the stretch run of the season, or they've had those teams on the ropes on the road.

    I don't think North Carolina gets in without winning the ACC or somehow beating Duke prior to the final. Every year there is all this alarm over who is on the committee or who is chairing it, and it's never really been a factor that I can tell. Dan Gavitt, David Worlock, and other NCAA staffers are in there. Even if they wanted to the committee members can't just blatantly cut deals with each other. Kentucky's AD was on the committee one year when both Kentucky and La Salle were on the bubble. Everyone was certain Kentucky was going to get selected because of favoritism and they didn't. La Salle did get in. Taking La Salle over Kentucky when Kentucky's AD is on the committee was a pretty strong sign to me that there are guard rails in place to keep that from happening. I for one am not going to get bent out of shape about UNC getting in until it actually happens.
    When did LaSalle get in over Kentucky?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •