Page 13 of 59 FirstFirst ... 3111213141523 ... LastLast
Results 121 to 130 of 584
  1. #121
    Sophomore
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    2,129
    Quote Originally Posted by xubrew View Post
    Someone is drunk, high, stoned, and brain damaged! There's no way that's Joe Lunardi. That's something else on the site that has nothing to do with him and that's WAAAAAAY out of whack!
    They are basing the categories almost strictly on their BPI formula. They even point out in a couple of the teams that their forecast is way off from everyone else lol

  2. #122
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    17,982
    Quote Originally Posted by XUMIOH12 View Post
    They are basing the categories almost strictly on their BPI formula. They even point out in a couple of the teams that their forecast is way off from everyone else lol
    So, they are actively letting everyone know how much their formula sucks? That's a bold strategy, Cotton.

  3. #123
    Supporting Member xu82's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    12,399
    Quote Originally Posted by Xville View Post
    Who the heck is in charge of bubble watch at ESPN? It's clear that person or staff have zero clue what is going on.
    Maybe the same person who used to handle their college basketball recruiting? I haven’t looked in years, but that used to be an embarrassment! All kinds of bad and outdated info. Shut that crap down.

  4. #124
    Sophomore
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    2,129
    Quote Originally Posted by Xville View Post
    So, they are actively letting everyone know how much their formula sucks? That's a bold strategy, Cotton.
    If you are using espn, ignore the bubble watch and at least look at lunardi. He's typically not as good at the seeding, but he tends to be pretty close on the in/out bubble situation.

  5. #125
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    17,982
    Quote Originally Posted by XUMIOH12 View Post
    If you are using espn, ignore the bubble watch and at least look at lunardi. He's typically not as good at the seeding, but he tends to be pretty close on the in/out bubble situation.
    Yeah agreed. I'm not a huge fan of his from a personality standpoint, but he does do a decent job at picking them, but as you said seeding not great

  6. #126
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    17,982
    Quote Originally Posted by XUMIOH12 View Post
    If you are using espn, ignore the bubble watch and at least look at lunardi. He's typically not as good at the seeding, but he tends to be pretty close on the in/out bubble situation.
    Yeah agreed. I'm not a huge fan of his from a personality standpoint, but he does do a decent job at picking them, but as you said seeding not great

  7. #127
    Sophomore webxu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Milford
    Posts
    415
    Espn is boosting their espn brands, nothing more on that bubble crap. Every other source has UC no where near the bubble and X having what basically amounts to 50/50, not the 30% espn gives them. That article is a business decsion nothing more
    Last edited by webxu; 02-07-2025 at 08:02 AM.

  8. #128
    Supporting Member GoMuskies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Wichita, KS
    Posts
    35,884
    Quote Originally Posted by xubrew View Post
    Someone is drunk, high, stoned, and brain damaged! There's no way that's Joe Lunardi. That's something else on the site that has nothing to do with him and that's WAAAAAAY out of whack!
    Yes, ESPN has now ADMITTED they were drunk, high, stoned and brain damaged. This appears in today's version of the Bubble Watch:

    "Upon further investigation, ESPN Analytics discovered there was an issue within the BPI forecast that affected the way the model was processing each team's chances, including the way it was taking in NET data in order to generate quad wins/losses."

    That's pretty embarrassing. Going back to look at our more "controversial" cases, Louisville is now a lock with a 97% chance to Dance, UNC is down to 19% (from like 87% at last check), and UC has retreated to 27% despite a fairly impressive 3 game win streak. Sanity has returned. A least a bit.

    Unfortunately, sanity also hit Xavier a bit on the Watch. Xavier has been downgraded to a 14% chance of making the Tournament, which sounds about right to me.

  9. #129
    Supporting Member paulxu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    21,213
    ...he went up late, and I was already up there.

  10. #130
    Junior
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    4,493
    UNC has to have a big nil pocket. Davis should be let go.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •