Correct- recruit much better between 50-125 guys that fit your system.
Completely disagree that there isn't going to be player development anymore? Of course, spending adequate NIL dollars are going to be critical, but it can't be the only thing we hang our hat on as a program. If it is, then pack the bags and call it a day and drop the program now b/c we (along with about 50 other programs) aren't going to be able to spend what the Top 10 programs are.
Too many guys looking at NIL the same way you do. There has to be a balance and guys have to want to play here, like the system and coaching staff AND need to be compensated competitively.
Results 71 to 80 of 89
-
02-09-2025, 03:35 PM #71
-
02-09-2025, 05:38 PM #72
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 369
-
02-09-2025, 05:54 PM #73
Money certainly helps and no one is arguing that. But it isn't the only thing which you seem to be going all in on. We're going to need to be much better talent evaluators that we've been the last 3 years. When you do spend the $$ you have to get the appropriate return more often than not.
-
02-09-2025, 06:57 PM #74X A V I E R
-
02-09-2025, 08:46 PM #75
- Join Date
- Dec 2018
- Location
- Omaha, NE
- Posts
- 91
I agree with this assessment. I cannot imagine Marquette and Creighton have deeper pockets than Xavier. UCONN, Villanova and Georgetown have deep pockets. That is not surprising. I cannot imagine St. John’s has a ton of NIL money considering that college athletics have always been an afterthought in the NYC market. Miller and company need to definitely focus on recruiting and developing talent. Need to get creative in this market. Maybe look at the guys that buy into the program and culture, but need some molding as well. Getting in a bidding war for players is not a winning strategy for Xavier moving forward. Cannot build a “team” around a bunch of money hungry players that are not willing to put in the work to get better. Yes, those players may be highly touted, but there are no guarantees they will pan out.
-
02-09-2025, 09:17 PM #76
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 369
Agree coaching is still vital as is the ability to identify talent. However, Richmond is making close to 7 figures alone, the Johnnie’s have a billionaire bankrolling their program. Have no doubt Miller can coach and knows talent, the question is will he have the resources to bring enough talent to X to compete at the top of the BE year in and out.
-
02-10-2025, 07:45 AM #77
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
- Posts
- 18,020
Yeah SJU is NYC basketball, it's just been dead for a while. There is a ton of money at that school. I understand X is never going to be able to compete dollars wise with UCONN and St. John's. It is what it is, but I think Creighton and Marquette are along the lines of NIL that X has. Maybe I'm way off, and if I am then what are we doing?
I'd really like to see a different strategy executed moving forward:
1.) Stress defense and toughness and bring those kinds of guys in. BE bodies. Enough offense, finesse guys. It doesn't work in this league. Even the Nova teams that looked like Steph Curry body doubles still had dudes on it with big bodies and tough!
2.) Freshmen recruiting and development. Spend a big amount of your NIL there. Of course there are going to be those that don't work out, I get it. And, this strategy is going to take a while to implement, but X has to start here.
3.) Take a serious look at the staff minus Miller. Are these guys worth the money that they are being paid? I don't know, but something seems off. Why has effort continually been an issue the last two years. Is culture an issue? Is it coaching? What is happening?
-
02-10-2025, 08:56 AM #78
-
02-10-2025, 10:07 AM #79
- Join Date
- Feb 2019
- Posts
- 386
Geez how freakin' bad are we going to be next year? This is depressing.
-
02-10-2025, 10:08 AM #80
Bookmarks