Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 40 of 40
  1. #31
    Quote Originally Posted by paulxu View Post
    More worthless paper. At least we're rising.
    So strange to not have Villanova in the mix.

    https://www.espn.com/espn/feature/st...ld-predictions
    8 seed? WTF?

    No. This squad is (as my teenagers would say) "low key" dangerous.

    there are too many excellent cards in his hand for Miller not to play this hand to some big money.

    top 3 finish in the BE, and 4 seed. I see a range of 2-6 for our seed. you heard it here first. No more Gytis. No more Abou.

  2. #32
    Quote Originally Posted by MHettel View Post
    8 seed? WTF?

    No. This squad is (as my teenagers would say) "low key" dangerous.

    there are too many excellent cards in his hand for Miller not to play this hand to some big money.

    top 3 finish in the BE, and 4 seed. I see a range of 2-6 for our seed. you heard it here first. No more Gytis. No more Abou.
    We can hope.
    Freemantle. Hunter, Hugley and Traore (if healthy and productive in BE) might help X get to top 4 in BE.

  3. #33
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    16,294
    If x is below a 5 seed, we had injuries. There is too much experience, too much versatility and too much miller to be lower than a 5.

  4. #34
    Supporting Member paulxu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    20,826
    Quote Originally Posted by Xville View Post
    If x is below a 5 seed, we had injuries. There is too much experience, too much versatility and too much miller to be lower than a 5.
    Up to 7 and playing in Lexington. Would be nice.
    But, the injury bug did bite us again.

    https://www.espn.com/espn/feature/st...ld-predictions
    ...he went up late, and I was already up there.

  5. #35
    Supporting Member GoMuskies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Wichita, KS
    Posts
    35,095
    It's only been one day, but we've already had an impact on Bracketology: Texas Southern joined the field in the latest Bracketology, presumably based on their respectable performance in Cintas last night.

    https://www.espn.com/espn/feature/st...ld-predictions

  6. #36
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    16,294
    I did see that they were at least picked to finish second and it was close to first in the swac. It’s the swac so take with that what you will, but hoping that once they get into conference, they win it, or at least not be a drag on the numbers

  7. #37
    All-Conference
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    8,591
    Quote Originally Posted by Xville View Post
    I did see that they were at least picked to finish second and it was close to first in the swac. It’s the swac so take with that what you will, but hoping that once they get into conference, they win it, or at least not be a drag on the numbers
    They had some decent pieces, and they played hard and physical. I could certainly see them making the tournament out of the SWAC.

    Still should have won by 20+.

  8. #38
    Supporting Member GoMuskies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Wichita, KS
    Posts
    35,095
    We're fourth among others receiving votes in the AP top 25.

  9. #39
    Supporting Member paulxu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    20,826
    ...he went up late, and I was already up there.

  10. #40
    I still believe.
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    4,922
    Xavier defeats Alabama in the second round in the "What is defense?" game of the year, 134-123
    We've come a long way since my bench seat at the Fieldhouse!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •