Politics Thread

[XU_Lou]

How so? If he got in due to AA, somebody else didn't.

At least he didn't lie about it...

Lower left hand corner: https://twitter.com/RealJamesWoods/s...05994176049152

[Masterofreality]

Aaaaand.. Loan forgiveness is Gonzo!!!
Thank Gawd for a Constitutional Supreme Court!!!!

[bobbiemcgee]

But then Biden just got 40 million votes

[Masterofreality]

But then Biden just got 40 million votes

Uh, no. 63% say the country is on the wrong track. That loan crap was already factored in.

[bobbiemcgee]

I think they rule 5-4 (Barrett joining the 3 liberals) on standing issue with Roberts being the swing vote and finding some narrow way to say they have standing that would be almost impossible to apply to any other case.

Then it is 6-3 citing the newly minted major questions doctrine to strike down the program.

If there was a 5th vote against standing (whether Gorsuch or Kavanaugh) I think that ruling could grow to 7-2 as the conservatives do no want to expand standing unless they really have to.

6-3 as usual

[bobbiemcgee]

Agree with the lgbtq decision. Business can reject customers.

[xuphan]

How so? If he got in due to AA, somebody else didn't.

Well, multiple posters on here said your post was racist. Let’s keep it civil.

[noteggs]

But then Biden just got 40 million votes

Ummm…

Think that was the whole point all along.

[STL_XUfan]

I think they rule 5-4 (Barrett joining the 3 liberals) on standing issue with Roberts being the swing vote and finding some narrow way to say they have standing that would be almost impossible to apply to any other case.

Then it is 6-3 citing the newly minted major questions doctrine to strike down the program.

If there was a 5th vote against standing (whether Gorsuch or Kavanaugh) I think that ruling could grow to 7-2 as the conservatives do no want to expand standing unless they really have to.

I expected that it would be a pretty tortured standing argument, but it really felt like the Chief mailed it in. I am not quite sure the point of having MOEHLA be a separate entity from the State of Missouri if the State of Missouri can sue (and I guess now be sued) as the owner of the corporation. I wonder if this will be used in other corporate structures or if they will just limit to state entities and not all corporate entities.

Not that I think this would happen, but it sets up the fun possibility of states invoking the original jurisdiction of the Court in a suit concerning realignment. The State of Georgia, on behalf of Georgia Tech, sues the State of North Carolina, on behalf of UNC, for leaving the ACC.

[bobbiemcgee]

Well, multiple posters on here said your post was racist. Let’s keep it civil.

2? He got into Yale on Aa. truth. Said it himself many times