Right. Specifically China. Less so North Korea for example. My guess is that it had very little to do with his outrage at their treatment of the Uighurs, and a lot more to do with economic rivalry, intellectual property, etc. It's one of his policy stances that I most supported, although I felt it would have been more effective if he had brought along a coalition of allies instead of going it alone.
Results 10,371 to 10,380 of 26458
Thread: Politics Thread
-
02-23-2021, 02:02 PM #10371Eat Donuts!
-
02-23-2021, 02:03 PM #10372
What else was Trump supposed to do to NK short of attacking them?
-
02-23-2021, 02:45 PM #10373
Not praising them?
If we are going to critique Biden's choice of words regarding China's treatment of Uighurs, then Trump's intermittent (but repeated) flattery as well as his boasting about how good of a relationship he had with Kim Jong Un would seem to be in a similar vein.
I don't really give a shit about either one, TBH. I'd like to see Biden keep the pressure on China, but mostly for economic reasons. To that end I'm more interested to see how his foreign policy unfolds than anything else.Eat Donuts!
-
02-23-2021, 03:34 PM #10374
-
02-23-2021, 03:47 PM #10375
I mostly do support an America First policy, within reason. I don't think we should go out of our way to be dicks about it, though. That's what I found frustrating about many of Trump's policies that I otherwise (somewhat) agreed with. There is a performative dickishness about it that I thought was unnecessary and ultimately hurt our cause.
Having said that, I think that there is a benefit to not systematically alienating our allies for no real reason or to no end. I also do think there is some amount of benefit to global leadership. It's not an either/or, and when we reduce our investment and involvement in unnecessary foreign affairs we should try to do so in a way that retains the respect of our allies in the developed world.
For example: Should we send (reasonable) aid to war torn hell holes? Yes. Should we intervene to try to stop them from being war torn hell holes? No, because it pretty much never works.Eat Donuts!
-
02-23-2021, 03:49 PM #10376
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Posts
- 2,196
-
02-23-2021, 03:59 PM #10377
-
02-23-2021, 04:05 PM #10378
-
02-23-2021, 04:09 PM #10379
I'm honestly curious as to why some people don't care. Is it just the 'my side vs your side' stuff, or do you really think that we just should do away with Presidential candidates releasing their tax returns? What is the harm in them doing it / what is the benefit to the Country in them not doing it?
Personally I would like to see deep financial disclosures (including tax returns) for every Presidential candidate so that we can get an idea as to who they owe money to, who the receive money from, etc. as those things could give an outside party leverage over that individual. It seems like a relatively basic thing to want to know about the person you elect to lead your Country.Eat Donuts!
-
02-23-2021, 04:17 PM #10380
Bookmarks