Politics Thread

[ArizonaXUGrad]

Well, now that the Senate has the FBI report, I'm sure both sides will give it a fair reading and agree 100% (or at least 99%) on the conclusions to be drawn from it. Grassley and Feinstein will likely hold hands at the joint press conference.

That is hilarious.

Damage is done here. Kavanaugh will carry this weight the rest of his career and the media drudge up his horrid testimony for years to come.

[bjf123]

Well, now that the Senate has the FBI report, I'm sure both sides will give it a fair reading and agree 100% (or at least 99%) on the conclusions to be drawn from it. Grassley and Feinstein will likely hold hands at the joint press conference.

How long did it take to type that? I’m guessing the belly laughs made it difficult to keep your fingers on the keyboard.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[bigdiggins]

That is hilarious.

Damage is done here. Kavanaugh will carry this weight the rest of his career and the media drudge up his horrid testimony for years to come.

He should sue Dr. Ford for slander.

[Caf]

Obviously the polarization in this country is nothing new, but I can't recall an event that has divided people more than this has.

[ArizonaXUGrad]

He should sue Dr. Ford for slander.

He won't win, see our slander laws they side with the accuser. Now in Europe, the case is a tad different as they lean to the accused party.

I find this quite funny. We know for certain that Kavanaugh at the minimum deliberately slanted his testimony and misrepresented others testimony to his favor. At worst, he lied. We know he lied regarding his behavior in both High School and College. We also saw him completely melt down last Thursday even noting a Clinton conspiracy. All this marginalia is enough to show he isn't Supreme Court justice material or any judge material for that matter. Why back him so hard? Are there no other conservative justices out there beyond reproach?

[Juice]

He won't win, see our slander laws they side with the accuser. Now in Europe, the case is a tad different as they lean to the accused party.

I find this quite funny. We know for certain that Kavanaugh at the minimum deliberately slanted his testimony and misrepresented others testimony to his favor. At worst, he lied. We know he lied regarding his behavior in both High School and College. We also saw him completely melt down last Thursday even noting a Clinton conspiracy. All this marginalia is enough to show he isn't Supreme Court justice material or any judge material for that matter. Why back him so hard? Are there no other conservative justices out there beyond reproach?

We do?

And because it's not about him. It's about the tactics used by Feinstein and the rest of them. In the words of Barack Obama, elections have consequences. And democrats haven't seemed to grasp that since Hillary lost.

[XU 87]

We do?

Yes, because Rachel Maddow said so.

[Juice]

Yes, because Rachel Maddow said so.

I forgot she's one of the best journalists out there.

[ArizonaXUGrad]

We do?

And because it's not about him. It's about the tactics used by Feinstein and the rest of them. In the words of Barack Obama, elections have consequences. And democrats haven't seemed to grasp that since Hillary lost.

It is about Kavanaugh (if it wasn't Gorsuch would have suffered the same fate), Party of Trump made the court political when they didn't even discuss Garland. This is the political division sown by current GOP'ers or POT'ers who so heavily back their leader. To look at politics in the present neglects to understand the cyclical nature of it.

Elections do have consequences, the people will suffer Trump's four years and in subsequent years. Party of Trump'ers will suffer when the big wheel of politics swings in the other direction which it inevitably does. When that happens, new leadership will be forced to deal with the consequences of the current.

[ArizonaXUGrad]

Yes, because Rachel Maddow said so.

Seriously, you offer nothing why do you post here?