Page 316 of 2647 FirstFirst ... 2162663063143153163173183263664168161316 ... LastLast
Results 3,151 to 3,160 of 26466

Thread: Politics Thread

  1. #3151
    Supporting Member GoMuskies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Wichita, KS
    Posts
    36,305
    Also, why the fuck is Samantha from Who's the Boss sitting behind Kavanaugh?

  2. #3152
    Supporting Member xudash's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    9,649
    And now Feinstein is on trial.
    X A V I E R

  3. #3153
    Supporting Member GoMuskies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Wichita, KS
    Posts
    36,305
    My sense after listening to the whole thing (while working, so not super focused listening)...he'll get confirmed. Might be 50-50, though. I think Flake is in, but I think he keeps at least one of Murkowski and Collins.

  4. #3154
    Good lord we watched something different. You know I am not guilty of attempted rape because I didn't put it in my calendar defense, I am sure we will see that in court rooms to come. Why bring in the female prosecutor to only bench her during Kav's questioning? She came out to start but was immediately pulled. What was with that?

    Ford looked composed, answered everything she could, Kav was an utter train wreck. Graham was a fool and looked unhinged. Where was this tirade when Garland couldn't get a minute of his time. It's clear to me that a full overhaul of both parties is in order.

    I don't know if he gets confirmed or not, but he looked really bad today. We are talking about a federal judge who should have looked more composed and prepared. This comes down to be a glorified job interview. I would not hire him after this.

  5. #3155
    Junior Lloyd Braun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Cleveland, OH
    Posts
    4,247
    Quote Originally Posted by ArizonaXUGrad View Post
    Good lord we watched something different. You know I am not guilty of attempted rape because I didn't put it in my calendar defense, I am sure we will see that in court rooms to come. Why bring in the female prosecutor to only bench her during Kav's questioning? She came out to start but was immediately pulled. What was with that?

    Ford looked composed, answered everything she could, Kav was an utter train wreck. Graham was a fool and looked unhinged. Where was this tirade when Garland couldn't get a minute of his time. It's clear to me that a full overhaul of both parties is in order.

    I don't know if he gets confirmed or not, but he looked really bad today. We are talking about a federal judge who should have looked more composed and prepared. This comes down to be a glorified job interview. I would not hire him after this.
    On why you didn’t see more of Rachel Mitchell per Sean Sullivan: ‘Senate GOP Whip John Cornyn explaining why Rachel Mitchell stopped asking Qs partway through: “Frankly, I think there was some frustration among the senators that they thought there were arguments that needed to be made, that she frankly was not equipped to make.”’

    This is a complete sham on both sides. It’s impossible to defend either party without being a complete shill.

  6. #3156
    Supporting Member noteggs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Posts
    4,018
    Quote Originally Posted by ArizonaXUGrad View Post
    Good lord we watched something different.
    Not really...

    As always, people just see it through a different lens.

  7. #3157
    Quote Originally Posted by Lloyd Braun View Post
    On why you didn’t see more of Rachel Mitchell per Sean Sullivan: ‘Senate GOP Whip John Cornyn explaining why Rachel Mitchell stopped asking Qs partway through: “Frankly, I think there was some frustration among the senators that they thought there were arguments that needed to be made, that she frankly was not equipped to make.”’

    This is a complete sham on both sides. It’s impossible to defend either party without being a complete shill.
    She is a prosecutor, she is completely qualified to cross Kavanaugh. I it was more of Kavanaugh being completely unhinged and ill prepared.

  8. #3158
    Supporting Member boozehound's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Cherry Hill, NJ
    Posts
    6,563
    Quote Originally Posted by xudash View Post
    Judge Kavanaugh is making libtards look awfully, awfully bad right now.
    Holy shitballs. I mean, the fact that you used the word 'libtards' pretty much tells me how capable you are of evaluating anything related to this through an objective lens, but still - holy shitballs.

    I don't know how anybody thought that went well. The entire thing was kind of a circus that doesn't make the Democrats look good either, and I don't think anyone had their mind changed today. Having said that - how does anybody think Kavanaugh gave a good testimony? He needed to be calm and consistent, not hysterical. Ford's testimony probably didn't change anybody's mind, but Kavanaugh's could have. Even if he isn't guilty, which nobody has proven he is, he certainly comes off as a little unhinged.
    Eat Donuts!

  9. #3159
    Sophomore Caf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    1,399
    Quote Originally Posted by boozehound View Post
    Holy shitballs. I mean, the fact that you used the word 'libtards' pretty much tells me how capable you are of evaluating anything related to this through an objective lens, but still - holy shitballs.

    I don't know how anybody thought that went well. The entire thing was kind of a circus that doesn't make the Democrats look good either, and I don't think anyone had their mind changed today. Having said that - how does anybody think Kavanaugh gave a good testimony? He needed to be calm and consistent, not hysterical. Ford's testimony probably didn't change anybody's mind, but Kavanaugh's could have. Even if he isn't guilty, which nobody has proven he is, he certainly comes off as a little unhinged.
    I listened to the entire thing for some reason and found Kavanaugh's composure to be spotty. I can't criticize him for those moments considering what he's going through. Some of his dismissals and rebuttals definitely made me pause, but again I can't imagine what this has been like for me. He really could have used someone telling him not to call the accusations from the twilight zone or mention the Clintons. That being said, no one with a right mind should have had any questions about the accusations answered today one way or another.

    In my view, the question for Senators voting on this is if Weinstein's sin of sitting on this is really worth nominating a potential sexual assaulter to the Supreme Court without doing full due diligence. The Dems made the original sin on this one, but there was not a single Senator on that panel who didn't politicize this for their party's gain and not a single one broke party lines. It's sad and disappointing.

  10. #3160
    Junior
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    3,307
    zip em up

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •