Page 30 of 2647 FirstFirst ... 20282930313240801305301030 ... LastLast
Results 291 to 300 of 26461

Thread: Politics Thread

  1. #291
    Sophomore Caf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    1,399
    Quote Originally Posted by GoMuskies View Post
    And since 1973 there hasn't been a Supreme Court that was potentially amenable to allowing such a law to stand. By the time this one found it's way to the Supreme Court, that may no longer have been the case.
    I don't think you're putting up what I'm putting down. I think Roe v Wade has a shot at being overturned over Trump, IF the alternative is 20 wk bans. A heartbeat bill, with not exceptions, is not going to go federal. There are enough conservatives who support exceptions to hold it back.

  2. #292
    Supporting Member GoMuskies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Wichita, KS
    Posts
    36,305
    Quote Originally Posted by Caf View Post
    I don't think you're putting up what I'm putting down. I think Roe v Wade has a shot at being overturned over Trump, IF the alternative is 20 wk bans. A heartbeat bill, with not exceptions, is not going to go federal. There are enough conservatives who support exceptions to hold it back.
    A ban post 20 weeks doesn't require overturning Roe v. Wade. And a heartbeat bill wouldn't need to go federal. Overturning Roe v. Wade wouldn't necessarily make abortion illegal. It would just allow individual states to have laws like the one Kasich vetoed.

  3. #293
    Sophomore Caf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    1,399
    Quote Originally Posted by GoMuskies View Post
    A ban post 20 weeks doesn't require overturning Roe v. Wade. And a heartbeat bill wouldn't need to go federal. Overturning Roe v. Wade wouldn't necessarily make abortion illegal. It would just allow individual states to have laws like the one Kasich vetoed.
    I could be wrong, but I believe the federal courts have held the line at viability which is 24 weeks.

  4. #294
    Junior Smails's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    2,714
    Quote Originally Posted by Lloyd Braun View Post
    To me a Trump presidency is like when Mufasa dies and Scar takes over. He introduces the hyenas as they slowly come out of the darkness and all the animals are like "whoa wait wtf is this about!?"
    The hyenas are excited that's for sure.
    dayton will lose by 40 and we will loot tonight.
    -Pablo

  5. #295
    Quote Originally Posted by Lloyd Braun View Post
    To me a Trump presidency is like when Mufasa dies and Scar takes over. He introduces the hyenas as they slowly come out of the darkness and all the animals are like "whoa wait wtf is this about!?"
    The hyenas are excited that's for sure.
    You don't understand the real Animal Kingdom you elitist.
    Run the table.

  6. #296
    Sophomore Caf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    1,399
    Quote Originally Posted by Smails View Post
    [video=youtube;O4-NZWpToHM]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O4-NZWpToHM
    Do you ever actually say anything? Or are all of your posts just rhetorical interjects?

  7. #297
    Supporting Member GoMuskies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Wichita, KS
    Posts
    36,305
    Quote Originally Posted by Caf View Post
    I could be wrong, but I believe the federal courts have held the line at viability which is 24 weeks.
    I don't know the actual rule in weeks or if one actually exists (Planned Parenthood v. Casey is the current authority), but the rule is that you cannot have a law that is an undue burden on a woman's right to abortion. Moving the line from 24 to 20 weeks doesn't necessarily require even overturning that precedent. It would just require the Court to decide that 20 weeks isn't an "undue burden".

    That's a far cry from overturning Roe v. Wade.

  8. #298
    Sophomore Caf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    1,399
    Quote Originally Posted by GoMuskies View Post
    I don't know the actual rule in weeks or if one actually exists (Planned Parenthood v. Casey is the current authority), but the rule is that you cannot have a law that is an undue burden on a woman's right to abortion. Moving the line from 24 to 20 weeks doesn't necessarily require even overturning that precedent. It would just require the Court to decide that 20 weeks isn't an "undue burden".

    That's a far cry from overturning Roe v. Wade.
    I see what you're saying. I'd be interested to learn more about the movement. There's definitely a nationwide push by prolife organizations to put the 20 week bans in as many states as possible. I know Roe v Wade is the ultimate target, but I'm unsure of what role 20 wks plays in a strategy.

  9. #299
    Supporting Member GoMuskies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Wichita, KS
    Posts
    36,305
    I'm sure they're just trying to push the line as far as possible under current law.

    By the way, if medical technology advanced enough to make a fetus at 6 weeks viable outside the womb, there'd be a good argument for a ban on abortions post week 6 of pregnancy. If a Catholic university with a good medical school announced the creation of a center dedicated to making fetuses viable outside the womb as early as possible, they'd break fundraising records the next day. And with medical technology advancing as rapidly as it currently is, you just never know what's possible.

  10. #300
    Supporting Member paulxu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    21,351
    This is starting to have a Matrix feel to it.
    ...he went up late, and I was already up there.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •