Politics Thread

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 94GRAD

Please provide details on how Biden is trying to have those two killed. Thanks

---

Gladly.

RFK Jr: Biden denied him secret service protection as typically granted for any prominent Presidential candidate.
Trump: Garland stated under oath he gave orders to shoot-to-kill in the MAR raid.

I googled Heartland Institute and this is what came up

The Heartland Institute is an American conservative and libertarian 501(c)(3) nonprofit public policy think tank known for its rejection of both the scientific consensus on climate change and the negative health impacts of smoking.

Now, I can understand the reasons for not believing in Climate Change, but to reject the negative impacts of smoking is absurd!!!!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 94GRAD

I googled Heartland Institute and this is what came up

The Heartland Institute is an American conservative and libertarian 501(c)(3) nonprofit public policy think tank known for its rejection of both the scientific consensus on climate change and the negative health impacts of smoking.

Now, I can understand the reasons for not believing in Climate Change, but to reject the negative impacts of smoking is absurd!!!!!

---

So you couldn’t find any flaws in the survey?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Muskie in dayton

So you couldn’t find any flaws in the survey?

---

If I really dug into it, I'm sure I could. #1 the survey was under 1100 people. #2 Like asked in the precious post, I'd like to know what extent the help was.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bjf123

And that’s why most European countries don’t allow mail in, or absentee, ballots. The risk of fraud is too great. Think they also require showing an ID to vote in almost every country.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

---

I’ll guess we will see if Lopez wins Buck’s seat. The district is roughly 80% Republican. I “mailed it in” this week.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 94GRAD

I googled Heartland Institute and this is what came up

The Heartland Institute is an American conservative and libertarian 501(c)(3) nonprofit public policy think tank known for its rejection of both the scientific consensus on climate change and the negative health impacts of smoking.

Now, I can understand the reasons for not believing in Climate Change, but to reject the negative impacts of smoking is absurd!!!!!

---

I know libertarians don't necessarily disagree with the negative affects of cigs but that it should be regulated. "If someone wants to smoke it's their own damn fault!" Maybe it's the 'second hand smoke' questions?

Here is the reality created by Progressive Law Enforcement/Social Justice Reform in the wake of George Floyd.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/police-of...cement-warning

People that support DEMOCRATS pushing to implement policy fomenting these demoralizing effects, AND have the ability to vote...are extremely dangerous.

People that believe the Big City crime environment created by these policies REDUCE CRIME...are just plain stupid.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Muskie in dayton

Gladly.

RFK Jr: Biden denied him secret service protection as typically granted for any prominent Presidential candidate.
Trump: Garland stated under oath he gave orders to shoot-to-kill in the MAR raid.

---

This is why it is difficult to take you all seriously. These are nonsense claims, spread by whatever sources you use for information,

RFK hasn't gotten secret service protection, because he is not a "major party" candidate as defined by statute, that allows for this protection to be granted by the Secretary of Homeland Security in consultation with the leaders of Congress. Title 18 U.S.C.' 3056(a)(7)

The FBI conducted the search at Mar-a-Lago specifically while Trump was out of town. They had standard operating instructions regarding safety of their personnel. The same instructions used in all search warrants.

https://thehill.com/regulation/court...ely-dangerous/

You may have seen the second claim in a Trump fundraising email. That should have alerted you to the likelihood that it was nonsense.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by paulxu

This is why it is difficult to take you all seriously. These are nonsense claims, spread by whatever sources you use for information,

RFK hasn't gotten secret service protection, because he is not a "major party" candidate as defined by statute, that allows for this protection to be granted by the Secretary of Homeland Security in consultation with the leaders of Congress. Title 18 U.S.C.' 3056(a)(7)

The FBI conducted the search at Mar-a-Lago specifically while Trump was out of town. They had standard operating instructions regarding safety of their personnel. The same instructions used in all search warrants.

https://thehill.com/regulation/court...ely-dangerous/

You may have seen the second claim in a Trump fundraising email. That should have alerted you to the likelihood that it was nonsense.

---

OMG, you can't be serious? LOL!! The king of Q-anon conspiracies and gaslighting lecturing another poster - pure gold!

BTW, how many times did you and Bobbie spread the Charlottesville lie? Looks like your buddies over at Snopes finally admitted this was a hoax - 7 years later:

"No, Trump Did Not Call Neo-Nazis and White Supremacists 'Very Fine People' "

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/tr...x=1718905525-1

https://x.com/snopes/status/1803900319178309662

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by XU_Lou

OMG, you can't be serious? LOL!! The king of Q-anon conspiracies and gaslighting lecturing another poster - pure gold!

BTW, how many times did you and Bobbie spread the Charlottesville lie? Looks like your buddies over at Snopes finally admitted this was a hoax - 7 years later:

"No, Trump Did Not Call Neo-Nazis and White Supremacists 'Very Fine People' "

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/tr...x=1718905525-1

https://x.com/snopes/status/1803900319178309662

---

lol someone that’s right about zero lecturing someone else, that’s hysterical.