Interesting how they’ve had to dismiss a number of potential jurors for Trump’s trial as they admitted they could not be impartial. Does anyone really think he’ll get a fair trial in NYC?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Printable View
[QUOTE=UCGRAD4X;782695]Apparently, you do.[/QUOT
not at all. Thought it was funny.
L
I take that as a positive sign. Sounds like most people are being honest instead of trying to weasel their way onto the jury in order to be a sure fire vote for conviction or acquittal. This was clearly anticipated as they have a pool of 500 to try to find 18 jurors (12 regular, 6 alternatives).
I think it is interesting that of the 7 seated already, 1 is a software engineer and 2 are attorneys. Engineers and attorneys are typically who you want to avoid having on a jury.
Could be. My fear is someone getting on the jury who’s already thinking about the book they’ll write about how they put Trump in jail.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
“In jail” was probably a poor choice of words. Let’s say “convicted” instead.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
One thing that hasn't really been discussed is if there's a favorable Trump juror that could also make it through voir dire. Trump doesn't necessarily need a not guilty verdict, but if there's a hung jury he may end up skating after all.