This is a very insightful post. Pay attention kids.Quote:
Originally Posted by Smails
Printable View
This is a very insightful post. Pay attention kids.Quote:
Originally Posted by Smails
It seems that someone is using master "trolling tactics" to illicit some contentious response to feed his habit.
I will gladly post some non-progressive realities that will serve nicely as the requested "answers".
1) Democrat " trickery" is on full display, as we speak, with this slack ass border proposal. There is basically zero $$$ for border enforcement, only more cash to process MORE ILLEGALS quickly. If handed this worthless legislation, every Dem running in the fall will foam at the mouth about "how they are clamping down on the border crisis".
2) Some very good Trump policies are MAX BORDER security, MAX DOMESTIC energy production, MAX CRIME deterrence w/ MAX support of ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT, MAX push for a return to a MERIT BASED culture, thus TOTAL ANTI-DEI...especially in our MILITARY. That's just the some of the entree on the menu.
Any push back here? Will the real shady Troll "Please stand up"?
:popcorn:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xuperman
https://www.kxlh.com/speaker-johnson...ead-on-arrivalQuote:
President Joe Biden intensified his rhetoric on the issue of border security Friday, telling lawmakers in a late-day statement that he was ready to take tough action on immigration if Congress can reach a deal.
Using rare strong language, President Biden characterized the situation at the border as a "crisis," and said if Congress passed the bill, he would "shut down the border" the same day he signed it into law.
Google can be your friend too.
You posted a link from YESTERDAY? YESTERDAY?Quote:
Originally Posted by paulxu
Are you people politically brain dead? Fact, this Administration, with the support of the ENTIRE DEMOCRAT party, has hammered home a NO CRISIS and secure border narrative for 3 YEARS!
The truth must be told when the commie scum that run our country lies incessantly:
THE ‘RAPE’.
During the latest episode of this trial, Carroll admitted she wasn’t doing very well financially and needed to find a way to sell more books. The testimony appears to be the basis for the very first claim she ever made, in New York magazine’s The Cut, in the summer of 2019.
Far from a compelling claim, the 80-year-old writer initially laid out the story that her supposed rape occurred either in 1994, before altering the day to be “in the fall of 1995 or the spring of 1996.” She couldn’t remember the specifics. What she did remember was that she was wearing a “Donna Karan coatdress and high heels but not a coat.” She later refused to produce said coat for DNA testing despite admitting to still owning it, describing it as “unworn and unlaundered since that evening.” It later came to light that the coatdress was not made in 1994 or 1995.
It didn’t matter to Carroll, who has accused multiple men of sexually assaulting or raping her throughout her life, including a babysitter’s boyfriend, a dentist, a camp counselor, an unnamed college date, an unnamed boss, and CBS chief executive Les Moonves.
Carroll also appeared to remember specifics such as the emptiness of the Bergdorf Goodman department store in the early evening – a detail she called “inconceivable” – as well as admitting that it was her who wanted to sexually harrass Trump originally because she wanted a “funny story to tell” about getting the then-infamous New York City developer to put on women’s lingerie.
Upon voluntarily entering a dressing room which she claims would “usually [be] locked until a client wants to try something on,” she claims Trump “unzips his pants, and, forcing his fingers around my private area, thrusts his penis halfway — or completely, I’m not certain — inside me.”
After apparently struggling free, she says, “I don’t remember if any person or attendant is now in the lingerie department. I don’t remember if I run for the elevator or if I take the slow ride down on the escalator. As soon as I land on the main floor, I run through the store and out the door — I don’t recall which door — and find myself outside on Fifth Avenue.”
The story itself beggars belief. If a celebrity had tried to rape me in a public place, I think the first thing I might have done was tell someone. In the words of her own friends, E. Jean Carroll is an “attention-seeker.” It is already difficult to imagine such a scenario unfolding without immediate consequences for the assailant, let alone when the victim is a nationally published attention-seeker.
LAW & ORDER.
But even if your sympathies still lay with Carroll, consider this. Carroll – a self-declared Law and Order TV show fan – first made her allegations against Trump in a 2019 book, just a few years after an episode of the show saw characters discuss a role-played rape in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room.
CNN reported in 2019 that Carroll was “an avid Law & Order franchise fan,” to which Carroll – an ostensibly damaged rape victim responded of the “coincidence”: “It tickled me to death.” She called it “a great, huge coincidence, but… a magnificent one.”
Carroll’s entire character is one of bizarre sexual thoughts, antics, and actions. Another piece of evidence the judge refused to allow was that Carroll named her cat “Vagina” and posted repeatedly about anal sex, celebrity fantasies, and pornography.
In fact, in 2012, Trump himself was the subject of one of these fantasies Carroll shared on her Facebook page: “Would you have sex with Donald Trump for $17,000?” before going on to suggest that in her fantasy scenario, Trump may not be able to speak. An odd thing to post for someone who alleges that the same man raped her less than two decades prior.
It goes on and on: https://thenationalpulse.com/analysi...rican-history/
("When" is more likely than "If") the attacks come, the blame will squarely be on Biden and the Democrats. Biden has committed treason.
This letter was written by ex-FBI Intel guys, and recently sent to Congress:
“The threat we call out today is new and unfamiliar,” they wrote. “In its modern history the U.S. has never suffered an invasion of the homeland, and, yet, one is unfolding now.”
“Military aged men from across the globe, many from countries or regions not friendly to the United States, are landing in waves on our soil by the thousands – not by splashing ashore from a ship or parachuting from a plane but rather by foot across a border that has been accurately advertised around the world as largely unprotected with ready access granted,” they wrote.
“It would be difficult to overstate the danger represented by the presence inside our borders of what is comparatively a multi-division army of young single adult males from hostile nations and regions whose background, intent, or allegiance is completely unknown,” they stated. “They include individuals encountered by border officials and then possibly released into the country, along with the shockingly high estimate of ‘gotaways’ — meaning those who have entered and evaded apprehension.”
“There have been over 1.7 million gotaways reported to have illegally entered and evaded capture since Biden’s been in office, the majority of whom are military age men,” The Center Square reports. “They are included in the more than 10 million total illegal border crossers reported to have entered the country from Jan. 1, 2021, to Sept. 30, 2023.”
“In light of such a daunting, unprecedented penetration by uninvited foreign actors, it is reasonable to assert that the country possesses dramatically diminished national security at this time,” the former FBI directors noted. “The nation’s military and laws and other natural protective barriers that have provided traditional security in the past have been thoroughly circumvented over the past three years.”
They stressed that a terrorist attack on American soil is now “a distinct possibility,” especially considering the savage attack on Israeli civilians by Hamas terrorists on October 7.
“Those of us who have fought terrorism know that, historically, successful terror attacks invite mimicry,” they told the congressional leaders. “We know, as well, that terror leaders intentionally cultivate throngs of young men possessing a certain easily-manipulated personality type to carry out atrocities.”
“It is stark to say so,” they continued, “but having a large number of young males now within our borders who could begin attacking gatherings of unarmed citizens, in imitation of 10/7 and at the behest of a foreign terror group, must be considered a distinct possibility.”
“We would be remiss not to call out this potentially grave threat in the most direct terms,” they added. “The warning lights are blinking.”
https://twitter.com/BillAckman/statu...22431155998825
https://www.bizpacreview.com/2024/01...ng-it-1431304/
I didn’t ask you. There is so much factually wrong with your first answer, It doesn’t even deserve a response. As for the second…What is push for max border security? What is he going to do? He’s said he will build a wall. That’s it. Ok next. Max crime deterrence? With what? Next. Return to a merit based culture—what does this even mean?Quote:
Originally Posted by Xuperman
I’ll give you domestic production.. cheaper gas, yay. That will be offset by the inflation he will exacerbate by the way he loves to spend spend spend. It’s the economy, stupid.
Tell your buddy to answer the question. He has no problem flooding the board with paragraphs of complete nonsense. He should have no problem answering a few simple questions. He will probably have to send a link, since he can’t think for himself. Believes that by doing that, it makes it true no matter how nonsensical it is. Defending a convicted rape and lithe lies behind it. That’s a new low, even for him.
We never got you review of Bettlejuice. On a scale of 1-10, how much did the song Dead Mom make you want to grope your significant other?Quote:
Originally Posted by 94GRAD
Still waiting for someone on here to sell me on either Biden or Trump as a presidential candidate in 2024. Trump and Biden are like dumb and dumber. They both are crappy candidates for a long list of reasons. Yet, most if not all the people on here seem to want to argue about which one is dumber. Newsflash, that still makes the other one dumb. Not much of a victory or selling point there.
Come on Haley! Pull out some sort of miracle and save this country from two old men.
Both sides are dumb and the worst possible candidate either side could come up with unless it was like aoc vs Greene. That could possibly be worse.Quote:
Originally Posted by xuphan
Regardless, you’re right, it’s a sad state of affairs.
Manchin said he might run. He’d be great but much like any third party candidate has no chance of winning. Too much money and power in the two party system sadly.