Politics Thread

I think it has more to do with how do we destroy the messenger because someone dared to share stories (some distorted by the committee) we’ve never heard before?

Listen we can agree J6 was f’ed up, but what’s wrong with hearing more of the story? It was not peaceful. However, we were forced fed a narrative from one side for two years.

How much have you heard/reported about the inconsistencies being told by the rest of MSM. You know about Epps, Hawley, and artificial crowd noise thing. Not much, if at all.

I'm not sure we were "force fed" a narrative. If you're watching an insurrection live, and people are bowling over the police in real time, and other people are trying to reach the president...begging him to call them off...does seeing some of them who breached the police line wandering the halls because there weren't enough cops there to evict them at that point...does that change the narrative? Is it less of a riot?

It's like someone said..you could watch the video of Kennedy in the car approaching Dealay Plaza and say all was OK.
Or you could look at him being shot.
The earlier video doesn't change what happened. It doesn't lessen the deed.

Watching some of the people who broke in wandering the halls doesn't change the basic facts. They weren't "tourists."
Tourists don't cross police barricades and force themselves inside a tourist attraction.

So timely Paul!! And sooooooooo expected!

When someone makes specific claims, and the responses are not specific, the response is not a response.


"So ask yourself one thing: In all the post-broadcast ranting about the Tucker Carlson Menace — and let’s not kid ourselves, he may invade Poland at any moment — how many politicians and media figures have you heard specifically addressing Carlson’s three narrow fact claims about Chansley, Hawley, and Sicknick?"

When someone makes specific claims, and the responses are not specific, the response is not a response. It’s chaff, and it’s meant to cloud the air.

https://chrisbray.substack.com/p/com...tle-buttercups


Yes, we were "force fed" a narrative. To deny that is 100% pure delusion. Sorry, Paul, your narrative just got destroyed...

This is Joe Biden's America - this is the absolute fucking crap that Paul voted for:


The Sniper who lost arm and leg in suicide blast tearfully recalls how he was IGNORED when he spotted suspect, moments before hundreds of ball bearings ripped through his body:

"'Over the communication network, we passed that there was a potential threat and that there was an IED attack imminent - this was as serious as it could get.

'I requested engagement authority while my team leader was ready on the M110 semi-automatic sniper system,' he added.

'The response, leadership did not have engagement authority for us, do not engage,' he said."



And then, to add insult to injury, Joe Biden / Paul's government didn't have the guts or the curtesy to ask this soldier who gave up his body to ask for his opinion:

"Even after his catastrophic injuries, Vargas-Andrews claimed no one asked him for a report."


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ithdrawal.html



Yea, Paul, keep bitchin about Trump and Tucker....

it's funny watching the lemmings all of a sudden turn away from their boy, tucker because reality is too much to handle regarding trump and dominion etc but in the same breath take his word as gospel for Jan 6th. Absolutely hysterical.

Tucker is probably laughing at you lemmings once he goes off the air, “can’t believe they actually believe the shit I say on a nightly basis.”

Cable News Ratings Overload Tue Mar 7

Fox News had more total and 25 to 54 year old demo viewers than MSNBC, CNN, Newsmax & NewsNation combined.

Primetime Average Demo | Total Viewers
1⃣
@FoxNews
404,000 | 3,057,000
2⃣
@MSNBC
163,667 | 1,494,333
3⃣
@CNN
94,333 | 448,667
4⃣
@NewsNation
17,667 | 122,667
5⃣
@Newsmax
8,333 | 98,000

https://twitter.com/RoadMN/status/16...e-narrative%2F

https://www.mediaite.com/daily-ratin...in-prime-time/


Tucker Carlson, who's very much in the news right now, drew 4.14 million viewers at 8 p.m., a massive delivery for a regularly-scheduled cable news program:

https://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/tues...t-week/525573/

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by paulxu

I'm not sure we were "force fed" a narrative. If you're watching an insurrection live, and people are bowling over the police in real time, and other people are trying to reach the president...begging him to call them off...does seeing some of them who breached the police line wandering the halls because there weren't enough cops there to evict them at that point...does that change the narrative? Is it less of a riot?

It's like someone said..you could watch the video of Kennedy in the car approaching Dealay Plaza and say all was OK.
Or you could look at him being shot.
The earlier video doesn't change what happened. It doesn't lessen the deed.

Watching some of the people who broke in wandering the halls doesn't change the basic facts. They weren't "tourists."
Tourists don't cross police barricades and force themselves inside a tourist attraction.

---

Hey Paul - here's some hard data showing your lying narrative has been destroyed - - and this poll was taken BEFORE Tucker's expose:

* 61% Believe Feds Helped Incite Capitol Riot - including 39% who think it’s Very Likely

* 80% of Likely U.S. Voters believe it is important that the public be able to view all the videos of the Capitol riot, including 58% who think it’s Very Important.

https://www.rasmussenreports.com/pub...e_capitol_riot

After the country has had some time to digest what Tucker has published, those numbers will grow even higher.

In the end, the liars are always exposed...

I'm glad to have this explanation for why all the rioters, including ones charged with sedition, have pled/or been found guilty.
And it certainly explains all the Republicans denouncing the "Tucker" stuff.

Much clearer now.

Meanwhile Paul ignores actual sedition vs the Atlanta Police department by Leftist Antifa rioters, including a lawyer for the Southern Poverty Law Center, who threw Molotov Cocktails at officers at a Police Training Center. Didn’t see any of those officers leading people around on a guided tour? Hmm

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by paulxu

I'm glad to have this explanation for why all the rioters, including ones charged with sedition, have pled/or been found guilty.
And it certainly explains all the Republicans denouncing the "Tucker" stuff.

Much clearer now.

---

Do you have a reading comprehension problem?

Did you even watch Tucker the last 3 nights? Or are you just taking your talking points from Rachel?

When someone makes specific claims, and the responses are not specific, the response is not a response. You're not responding to what Tucker presented. This is why everyone on this board knows your a total fraud.


Oh yea, I'm so glad to see your on the same side as Mitch. See, we on the right - that is team sanity/reality - have always had a strong diversity of thought within our ranks. I know, that's pretty shocking to you coming from a party that demands blind obedience - no matter how insane the policy or issue is.