Printable View
Now you partly know why the J6 committee’s final report will be focusing on Trump only and not law enforcement activity. Thought focusing on various breakdowns was one of the goals to avoid another. Guess this is what happens when you have a partisan committee.Quote:
Originally Posted by Masterofreality
As to the “non profit” Stacy Abrams sure has collected a lot of money in her grift of election denial, and has either squirreled it away or blown it on losing races. Wonder what her next grift will be, but to the overall point of Election Denial, she has cleaned up big time in that line of bullshit.Quote:
Originally Posted by paulxu
Hey, the article YOU posted said that Rhodes was not in DC or at the Capitol on January 6. How can I comment on what a news article posted as fact, unless it’s to say that, if false, Journalism is Dead??? I have to assume that some reporter from that source was at the trial?
Paul, your circus, your monkeys.
Meanwhile, in Arizona...
So, we have one county (Cochise) in Arizona who does not want to certify their election results even though they are bound by state law to do so. If their results are not certified, this would literally flip a congressional seat from Republican to Democrat. Now, I know this has very little chance of happening, but this shows just how moronic the Cochise County Commissioners are that they're continuing to act like 9-year-olds because they didn't get their favorite toys for Christmas.
So Hobbs is pressuring a county to certify an election for Gov she won while not recusing herself as SoS? Nothing to see here.Quote:
Originally Posted by X-band '01
County election managers change the zip code of 31,000 voters on September 3. Ballots go out that week. Those 31,000 are undeliverable. Someone collects those valid ballots. On September 15th, those addresses are quietly changed back.
National Change of Address Database (NCOA) will not pick up those address changes. They didn’t happen because there is no history.
The 31,000 citizens were getting their mail just fine -- except for ballots. Ballot addresses were driven by the county mail-in ballot database -- the one that was changed, then changed back.
Here’s the fraud equation taking place across the country:
* Count the in-person votes on election day.
* Count the early, in-person votes.
* Shut down the system (Atlanta water leak, Maricopa County everything).
* Bring in undeliverable ballots gathered when you changed voters’ names, addresses, or zip codes, then changed them back.
* Determine the votes you need to win. Press the “WIN” button.
* Wait for the Republicans to file a lawsuit months later.
https://www.americanthinker.com/arti...ion_fraud.html
Meanwhile, in AZ:
Shocking Local AZ Election Data: GOP Turnout Up, Dems Down, Yet Dems Won - Here Are the Alarming Numbers
https://www.westernjournal.com/shock...rming-numbers/
This is the article I posted: https://fox8.com/news/oath-keepers-l...us-conspiracy/Quote:
Originally Posted by Masterofreality
Nowhere in that article does it say Rhodes was not in DC. It only said he did not enter the Capitol building.
You said he wasn't in DC:So, I posted another article where he said on the witness stand that he was in DC at a hotel, and subsequently went to the Capitol.Quote:
and Rhodes wasn’t even in Washington on January 6.
Why did you say that he wasn't in DC? That wasn't indicated anywhere in any article. In fact, he said on the witness stand he was in DC.
This sort of stuff makes for difficult conversations.
Yeah, saw this in multiple publications today. Who runs elections in each state? Nothing to see here.Quote:
Originally Posted by XU_Lou
Huh?Quote:
Originally Posted by paulxu
I guess in your effort to prove an invalid point, you missed this:
”Members of the right-wing Proud Boys are also due in court on seditious conspiracy charges next month, including the group’s leader, Enrique Tarrio, who, like Rhodes, never entered the Capitol and was not present in Washington that day.”
“On the witness stand”. Rhodes said he was in a hotel. Where? Where was the “Hotel”, Paul. It says zero about the Hotel being in DC. Just a “Hotel”. There are tons of “Hotels” around. I’m sure the lawyers on this site would be happy to pick apart that “damning evidence” when you can’t even place where the “Hotel” is. Baltimore? New York? Richmond? Wilmington? Where??
Yeah, your picking and choosing of what you’ll be outraged about (See Hakeem Jeffries, Stacy Abrams and Hilary Clinton- Election Deniers) makes for difficult conversations.
Two questions Paul.
-Why do you still live in a State that is totally run by Republicans, who you abhor?
-Can two women have a baby without male assistance in some form (donor, IVF)?
Senator Schumer was celebrating his daughter & her partner having a kid last night after passage of a same sex marriage bill.
But Schumer and Biden’ Supreme Court pick couldn’t define what a woman is in her Vetting hearings.
Your party is all for this trash of being unable to define what gender is. (They, Them) Congratulations!!
You have to understand the construction of sentences in the English language:
"was not present in Washington that day" refers to Enrique Tarrio...not to Stewart Rhodes.Quote:
Enrique Tarrio, who, like Rhodes, never entered the Capitol and was not present in Washington that day.”
I can't believe you have gone to such great lengths to justify misreading the entire Rhodes situation.
Yes, Rhodes said "hotel." What difference does it make which hotel?
He said on the stand he "went to the Capitol". So you just ignored that to deflect about all kinds of other stuff.
Maybe he was at a "hotel" that morning in Idaho, and just somehow magically transported himself to the Capitol that day.
And then go into massive deflection about where I live, or Schumer, or Clinton, or whatever.
Oh, does it now?? Maybe if you believe that, you should take it up with the author who constructed the sentence? “Tarrio, who, Like Rhodes, never entered the Capitol and was not present in Dc that day.” If the author meant what you say, he could have easily just left out the “and” then started a quick new one where he says “Tarrio was not present in DC that day, unlike Rhodes”. But he didn’t. Huh, a professional writer being accused of poor sentence construction by a desperate lefty trying to justify his premise? Sounds like an attack on our free press to me!!
And “the hotel” matters. It could have been an easy hour or two drive away. I guess Paul doesn’t understand Mid Atlantic Geography where there are numerous large cities within 2 hours with LOTS of hotels! I know. I stayed in a bunch of them that were not in DC.
And, once again Paul refuses to answer legit questions that are not deflection. I answered your stupid premise. Now answer my legit one.