Called boozehound a "smug prick"Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbiemcgee
I'll hang up and listen.
Printable View
Called boozehound a "smug prick"Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbiemcgee
I'll hang up and listen.
His impeachment had nothing to do with Russian election involvement in 2016.
It had to do with him abusing the power of his office in strong arming an ally (the Ukrainians) to do his bidding against his political opponent, and threatening to withhold Congressionally approved assistance.
And the second article was for obstructing the investigation.
Those were real issues, as were the issues in his second impeachment.
Was he wrong?Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbiemcgee
Zelensky said numerous times it was a proper phone call. I’m REALLY glad you brought this up!!Quote:
Originally Posted by paulxu
The REAL issue was Hunter $80,000/month Biden, which the Dems were trying to shield by this sham procedure.
Yeah, Paul. In light of the Hunter Biden laptop story which has proven to be true, with the involvement of “The 10% Big Guy”, I really don’t think you want to go down this path. That’s one of the things Biden will be Impeached for soon.
Get ready for fun!!!!
And what about liar Adam Schiff, Paul?
When your article of impeachment states you have abused the power of your office, then all you've got left is to talk about a laptop?
Seriously?
What a weak ass response.Quote:
Originally Posted by paulxu
Yup. Because A. You refuse to acknowledge that it was a 100% partisan procedure, that the actual facts prove was irrelevant (The articles were 100% written by Democrats)
B. The laptop was a scandal (proven to be accurate now that even The NY Times admits it’s true) that the mainstream press, Facebook and Twitter surpressed the story in October 2020. You refuse to address the issue.
Hahaha. More to come.
Good luck with your laptop deal. Sounds like a lot of people may have helpedQuote:
“The experts found the data had been repeatedly accessed and copied by people other than Hunter Biden over nearly three years,” our report explained, with those we spoke with being unable to “reach definitive conclusions about the contents as a whole, including whether all of it originated from a single computer or could have been assembled from files from multiple computers and put on the portable drive.”
For example:
“[An expert] also found records on the drive that indicated someone may have accessed the drive from a West Coast location in October 2020, little more than a week after the first New York Post stories on Hunter Biden’s laptop appeared.”
“Over the next few days, somebody created three additional folders on the drive, titled, ‘Mail,' ‘Salacious Pics Package’ and ‘Big Guy File’ — an apparent reference to Joe Biden.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...who-leaked-it/
This from another of your fave media: The biased Washington Post.Quote:
Originally Posted by paulxu
You got problems, and Hunter was dealing with an enemy- China
. In particular, there are verified emails illuminating a deal Hunter Biden developed with a fast-growing Chinese energy conglomerate, CEFC China Energy, for which he was paid nearly $5 million, and other business relationships. Those business dealings are the subject of a separate Washington Post story published at the same time as this one on the forensic examinations of the drive.
The drive also includes some verified emails from Hunter Biden’s work with Burisma, the Ukrainian energy company for which he was a board member.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/techn...data-examined/
Ohhh Bobbie...bless your heart. How am I a liar? I never said I didn't call people names, only that I'm not the 'worst on the board' as you contend. You are missing my point as usual but that's a bit par for the course for you.Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbiemcgee
YOU are the one who called out the horror of name calling. I was simply pointing out that you are one of the biggest offenders on this board. See how that works? I never said I was not guilty of doing it..ever. Again, please prove your point that I am the biggest offender on this board. I'd like to see a tally of everyone that shows where they rank. Maybe a top ten or something like that. After all you are the accuser and the burden of proof lies with you. We can all cherry pick our arguments and find examples, but YOU decided to die on the hill of 'quit calling people names'. Personally I don't give a shit, but you seem to really care so you should consider practicing what you preach.
You know what I love about the little search you did? At the very least it proves that I am an equal opportunity name caller..calling out idiocy on both sides of the aisle. Keep up the research. I'm looking forward to the top 10 tally. Weed muscles...I get a chuckle every time I see that one again. Thanks
So Biden's son had business dealings with China...and that's wrong because...China is "the enemy."
But Trump's daughter Ivanka had/has many business dealings with China...and that's OK because...reasons.
Got it.