Muskie
12-11-2008, 10:43 AM
From Yahoo (http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/basketball/news?slug=dw-indiana120908&prov=yhoo&type=lgns)
"The NCAA just didn’t have to base its satisfaction with IU on an illogical (and inaccurate) standard.
What criteria did the NCAA use to judge the “condition of the program” (it’s actually quite good)? Why should anyone care that a cheating school might lose some games (isn’t that the point)? And how did Potuto figure Indiana was, presumably, going to struggle since the Hoosiers record at the time was just 2-2?
The statement spoke to the NCAA’s history of going easy on powerhouse programs while burying small schools."
"The NCAA just didn’t have to base its satisfaction with IU on an illogical (and inaccurate) standard.
What criteria did the NCAA use to judge the “condition of the program” (it’s actually quite good)? Why should anyone care that a cheating school might lose some games (isn’t that the point)? And how did Potuto figure Indiana was, presumably, going to struggle since the Hoosiers record at the time was just 2-2?
The statement spoke to the NCAA’s history of going easy on powerhouse programs while burying small schools."