PDA

View Full Version : Clarity and the (Bailout) Problem



xudash
09-30-2008, 11:31 PM
So I'll give you the cliff notes (and I wish I had thought of it):

1. No direct bailout, meaning the federal government does not buy the paper.

2. The government pursues a liquidity play: invest in institutions via a preferred share instrument.

3. Free cash flow goes to that preferred issue firstly, essentially with any preexisting debt issues subordinated to the preferred dividend, which would carry a nice yield for the tax payers.

4. Then you let the market do its thing. In other words, don't allow a bunch of bureaucrats in DC take control of all these mortgages throughout the US. They will screw it up. History shows that they will screw it up. The companies that marketed the mortgages, that were driven by fees and not credit worthiness and that now want to survive and move forward, know their markets and, with proper supervision/regulation, will reprice and reset property values and mortgages one by one. Don't think that this will be slow; this activity will occur at a high rate of volume. It will take time given the size of the problem, but the market will work efficiently to work this thing through.

5. As the companies work the problem to the end, the preferred issues are retired.

6. And life moves on.


All this has me recalling some of the RTC abuses that took place during the S&L crisis.

Having typed this, I'll excuse myself to make a drink, knowing that our friends inside the Beltway will, indeed, end up with a structure that calls for buying the paper. At least it remains a free country, where my liver and I can retire for the evening to commiserate, laugh and cry, all at the same time.

BTW, the above idea came from Vegas. It's Steve Wynn's idea. He knows a little something about being a good businessman and about making money.

MADXSTER
09-30-2008, 11:49 PM
All this has me recalling some of the RTC abuses that took place during the S&L crisis.

The difference is that people eventually went to prison for that.

This is bigger and more broad, considered a national crisis and yet is simply called poor management. Yell "fire" in a movie theatre and go to jail. Put the national economy on the brink, pass go and collect 90 mil. Something just isn't right here.

Not one person will even sit in front of a board of review.

xudash
10-01-2008, 12:03 AM
The difference is that people eventually went to prison for that.

This is bigger and more broad, considered a national crisis and yet is simply called poor management. Yell "fire" in a movie theatre and go to jail. Put the national economy on the brink, pass go and collect 90 mil. Something just isn't right here.

Not one person will even sit in front of a board of review.

Well, the first customer - screw a review board, I'm talking legal action - may be WAMU's CEO. He put out an "everything is fine" letter only to have all hell break loose. Other factors involved. Believe me, the FBI is very busy right now.

DART87
10-01-2008, 12:06 AM
Any link to this proposal?

xudash
10-01-2008, 12:56 AM
Any link to this proposal?

Caught it on an interview this evening. No text of which I am aware.