APR Postseason Bans

[xubrew]

I hate that for Milwaukee.



Baseball
Mississippi Valley State University


Football
Alabama State University
Florida A&M University
Mississippi Valley State University
Prairie View A&M University
St. Francis University (Pennsylvania)
Savannah State University
University of Arkansas, Pine Bluff
University of Idaho
University of Nevada, Las Vegas


Men’s basketball
Alabama State University
Appalachian State University
Florida A&M University
Houston Baptist University
Lamar University
San Jose State University
University of Central Arkansas
University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee


Men’s Cross Country
New Jersey Institute of Technology
Norfolk State University

Men’s Golf
Alabama A&M University


Men’s Soccer
Howard University


Men’s Tennis
Florida Atlantic University
Georgia State University


Men’s Indoor Track
Charleston Southern University
Delaware State University
East Tennessee State University
Louisiana Tech University
New Jersey Institute of Technology
Norfolk State University


Men’s Outdoor Track
Charleston Southern University
New Jersey Institute of Technology
Norfolk State University


Wrestling
Campbell University
University of Buffalo


Women’s Lacrosse
Howard University


* Waiver pending
All teams at Southern University are currently ineligible for post-season competition due to unusable data.

[X-band '01]

Amusing seeing NJIT on the list for a couple of sports.

[drudy23]

Based on the list, how soon will we here that the APR is discriminatory to historically Black colleges? There's ALOT on there.

[xubrew]

Based on the list, how soon will we here that the APR is discriminatory to historically Black colleges? There's ALOT on there.

We're hearing that already.

It is discriminatory to schools with low resources, and the SWAC and MEAC (especially the SWAC) have very few resources and even fewer experienced personnel.

It isn't all academics either. It's a high number of transfers at those schools, which hurts the retention component of the APR.

[blobfan]

Amusing seeing NJIT on the list for a couple of sports.

One would suspect a lot of the same players involved in indoor track, outdoor track and cross-country, though.

[MADXSTER]

One womens team. Not bad.

[GoMuskies]

One womens team. Not bad.

Plus all Southern's women's teams.

[X-band '01]

Southern is a completely different matter; whoever is in charge of compliance over there has a complete mess on their hands if the NCAA can't even audit their compliance data. NONE of their teams can be eligible for postseason play until they sort out that mess.

[XU '11]

Based on the list, how soon will we here that the APR is discriminatory to historically Black colleges? There's ALOT on there.

They already have lower standard that they still didn't meet.

They only needed a 910 APR to be postseason-eligible (everybody else needs 930).

link (http://fs.ncaa.org/Docs/NCAANewsArchive/2012/april/limited-resource%2binstitutions%2ballowed%2bflexible%2btra nsition%2bto%2bhigher%2bapr%2bstandardsdf30.html)

[xubrew]

Apparently Southern had not updated their CAI since 2009, and there were gross inaccuracies dating all the way back to 2003. That's a problem.

Last year was the current A.D.'s first year on the job. I can't imagine. "Welcome to Southern!!"

It's worth noting that most of the staff that's there now wasn't there when the mess piled up. They just got there right when it hit the fan and are left behind to clean it up.