Who should get smacked down

[MADXSTER]

You have till the end of the month to vote. Though either could be banned by then.

You get to decide! Make your vote count! Be active! If you don't vote then don't complain!

Jesus or Barabus

[Kahns Krazy]

I would vote neither because it is a smack board, but I think using a guy's real name and the personal attacks that border on actual harrassment are over the line, even for a smack board.

[PMI]

I voted none as well, but LH did possibly cross the line after he lost his composure per usual. I'd say if Filthy were to come out and say he felt that went too far, didn't want his name posted, etc., then the posts should be deleted and LH should take a break, during which time we'd all have to turn to some grown up humor for entertainment.

[Juice]

IMO revealing someone's name is a big no-no but I don't know either person.

[bobbiemcgee]

I think Filthy IS his real name.

:eek:

[MADXSTER]

I say both of them because that's just how I roll.

[blobfan]

Based on the thread alone, I say it's smack and let it go. But if Filthy objects to the name revelation, the moderators should do something, either a temporary ban or putting LH on probation. Not sure it it would warrant double-secret yet but LH seems to be working his way there.

[JimmyTwoTimes37]

I think there's more to this than meets the eye. These two seem to have a long history that spans to this board's infant days. These two are like North and South Korea.

[Jumpy]

Let's just take this chance to get rid of LH once and for all. The guy can't have a normal conversation and derails any thread he enters into a juvenile pissing match.

[Filthy Chilean]

Whatever the masses decide is fine by me. I just love reading threads and seeing some half-wit call me out without provocation.

I do more reading than posting these days anyway. My two cents would be to throw _LH off the deep end by eliminating his only reason for living.

[Juice]

I think there's more to this than meets the eye. These two seem to have a long history that spans to this board's infant days. These two are like North and South Korea.

But which one is which?

[JimmyTwoTimes37]

But which one is which?

_LH has got to be Kim Jong _L. Filthy retaliated when provoked. I don't see the problem in that

When it comes to _LH, at first I thought he was a troll from UC or Dayton. Then I realized he was actually a legit person with obviously some psychological problems. The guy goes on Cincinnati.com and posts on every single Cincinnati Streetcar article at least 100 times a day using the same bizarre posting behavior. That is not normal. I can't even read the comment section to get a feel anymore because of him. I will admit though, I love seeing him on a UC article going after UC fans. It gives me a great laugh. But God knows where else he posts.

He's been banned by Pablo in the past from what I've heard and he went absolutely ape before reinstatement

He has at least 2 known screen names on here we know of. At this point, I don't see what removing him would accomplish. He'd probably just create another screen name anyways.

[Jumpy]

What's his other name on here? That must be how he got so many green rep bars. Repping himself over and over.

[JimmyTwoTimes37]

What's his other name on here? That must be how he got so many green rep bars. Repping himself over and over.

I must admit, I repped him when he started going after a UC fan. I thought it was hilarious watching the UC fan vent his frustration like we all have when arguing with him.

It's George Remus

[nuts4xu]

I think the mods can determine the IP address. Anytime I've tried to set up a new name, Xeus deletes it in like 5 minutes.

I wonder What Jesus Christ would do in this situation?

[JimmyTwoTimes37]

I think the mods can determine the IP address. Anytime I've tried to set up a new name, Xeus deletes it in like 5 minutes.

I wonder What Jesus Christ would do in this situation?

Haha, I think Kahns got caught as well but it was pretty funny.

What happened was myself, Snipe, Kahns, and some others were discussing something in the streetcar thread. _LH made a derogatory statement to someone, got suspended, and within minutes GeorgeRemus came on defending _LH and carrying on the exact same argument. Snipe commented "_LH?" on the thread in response.

It starts here.

http://www.xavierhoops.com/forums/showthread.php?t=15878&page=34

[Kahns Krazy]

Someone who joined in the mass exodus of January-08 but has never posted voted against _LooHooser.

Ouch. 3 years of silence broken only by a vote to ban LH.

[Smails]

Where did the thread go?

I should have known that Grerge Remus was LH when one of his responses was... 'see'

[JimmyTwoTimes37]

I clicked on the streetcar comment section on the Enquirer, this is the first message I saw:

"132 posts for GeorgeRemuss TODAY. Since 9:04 am EST. Think about that...

132 posts by GeorgeRemuss.

Over the span of 6 hours. And this is a LOW VOLUME day for him. "

This person goes on to say:

"Lets break that down.

There are 428 total posts. He has 132 of them meaning he's SOLELY RESPONSIBLE for 30.84% of all the posts"

http://news.cincinnati.com/comments/article/20110126/NEWS01/101270333/Streetcar-fans-fight-ballot-drive

Then our _LH/GeorgeRemuss is mocked by everyone. Absolutely hilarious.

[PMI]

The guy clearly has issues. This is not something we've just learned.

[Masterofreality]

Voted neither......

..........but "NO NAMES, PLEASE!!!"

[PMI]

Well, _LH, if you actually read this thread you'll know that I voted to not have you banned, but obviously I haven't lost any sleep over it. Please go back away now, things were going so well...

[xubrew]

what did i miss?? what did i miss??

[JimmyTwoTimes37]

what did i miss?? what did i miss??

Nothing really. Typical _LH.
_LH went nuts on Filthy for no reason in the other thread then all hell broke loose resulting in this poll question. Now, since he can't post on here for the time being, he's shattering and abusing the Cincinnati.com's comment sections. I am enjoying his banter towards the UC fans though. He's driving them crazy

This is what its like to argue with _LH

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HvSjiq1pLVY

[PMI]

He registered under another name and started his typical shit, calling out a few of us. It's all been deleted thankfully.

[JimmyTwoTimes37]

He registered under another name and started his typical shit, calling out a few of us. It's all been deleted thankfully.

When was this?!?

[PMI]

Sometime yesterday afternoon. I honestly can't remember exactly. He was using the name CleanColumbian. It's really no big deal and he got banned within twenty minutes or so.

[MADXSTER]

Here's a new sitcom....

_LH and Swampy Meadows becoming roommates. :D

"The Oddest Couple"

[Emp]

"....but the strawberries, that's where I had them. I proved with geometric logic that a duplicate key to the icebox existed. I could have produced that key. They were protecting some officer ..."
Captain Queeg in The Caine Mutiny trial.

Im assuming the mods can take care of someone who starts publicly identifying posters.

On the other hand, it's really hard for me to believe that, in a chat room full of adults, some wild, impulsive individuals get full threads with painstakingly researched and documented, to prove with geometric logic that someone is posting under an assumed name or another. And that this little social network of "ins" and "outs" , red reps and green reps, is used to create a hierarchy of those worthy of respect, or disdain and banning. It sounds like junior high cliques.

It's really so important to ban those whose voices one finds grating? There is an ignore feature than solves all of these issues.

[nuts4xu]

Is this a permanent exile? Please say it is so.

Life is so much better without that jackhole around.

[JimmyTwoTimes37]

Here's a new sitcom....

_LH and Swampy Meadows becoming roommates. :D

"The Oddest Couple"

Now that would be hilarious. Stick them on the Jersey Shore together from November to Late March...Film every second of their interactions.

[Kahns Krazy]

It's really so important to ban those whose voices one finds grating? There is an ignore feature than solves all of these issues.


This isn't a democracy, it's a private message board. There is nothing noble about letting a disruptive individual continue to disrupt.

[I'msorryMods]

This isn't a democracy, it's a private message board. There is nothing noble about letting a disruptive individual continue to disrupt.

In my opinion, no one should be banned on the smack board. Suspension yes. Banning no,.

[I'msorryMods]

Is this a permanent exile? Please say it is so.

Life is so much better without that jackhole around.

His posts were much better than this one above :rolleyes:

[Muskie]

These polls have no input on what happens to posting privileges here. The posters usually make it pretty clear by their own posts. Some are here to post about Xavier basketball. Some are here to cause trouble.

[Kahns Krazy]

In my opinion, no one should be banned on the smack board. Suspension yes. Banning no,.

That's a perfectly valid opinion, and you are free to run your message board that way.

[PMI]

Dude. Brett Favre thinks you never go away.

[Kahns Krazy]

Dude. Brett Favre thinks you never go away.

Someone rep this shit for me. That is hilarious.

[MADXSTER]

Someone rep this shit for me. That is hilarious.

Tried but the man wouldn't let me.

[SixFig]

Tried but the man wouldn't let me.

Done. Pay it forward.

[_LH]

He registered under another name and started his typical shit, calling out a few of us. It's all been deleted thankfully.

That is incorrect. I don't know who that was but it was not me. The mods can confirm, I'm sure, if you like.

[_LH]

_LH has got to be Kim Jong _L. Filthy retaliated when provoked. I don't see the problem in that

When it comes to _LH, at first I thought he was a troll from UC or Dayton. Then I realized he was actually a legit person with obviously some psychological problems. The guy goes on Cincinnati.com and posts on every single Cincinnati Streetcar article at least 100 times a day using the same bizarre posting behavior. That is not normal. I can't even read the comment section to get a feel anymore because of him. I will admit though, I love seeing him on a UC article going after UC fans. It gives me a great laugh. But God knows where else he posts.

He's been banned by Pablo in the past from what I've heard and he went absolutely ape before reinstatement

He has at least 2 known screen names on here we know of. At this point, I don't see what removing him would accomplish. He'd probably just create another screen name anyways.


There are so many lies in this post, I don't know where to begin.

I was never banned from Pablo's board or by Pablo.

Also, I don't post on Cincinnati.com so if someone is they are using my "name".

I served my suspension for posting "smack" on the smack board. I never outed anyone but FC did out himself with his reply.

I can see that I am well liked on this board which brings a big smile to my face. You can expect my low posting numbers to climb dramatically as I will now make a point to post more since I am so loved.